Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "debug_issue_xyz".
Did you mean:
debug_issue_xyx
2017 Sep 02
0
Block comment?
...ment containing code (as opposed to
arbitrary text) that you want to be able to easily run the commented out
code? If so the 'if()' construct has the advantage that you only need to
change code at the start of the comment, not at both ends.
The if(FALSE) could be if(isTRUE(getOption("DEBUG_ISSUE_XYZ"))) so you
would not even have to change code to re-enable the debugging code, just
call options(DEBUG_ISSUE_XYX=TRUE)).
Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Suzen, Mehmet <msuzen at gmail.com> wrote:
> AFAIK block comment is not possible
&g...
2017 Sep 02
2
[FORGED] Re: Block comment?
...opposed to
> arbitrary text) that you want to be able to easily run the commented out
> code? If so the 'if()' construct has the advantage that you only need to
> change code at the start of the comment, not at both ends.
>
> The if(FALSE) could be if(isTRUE(getOption("DEBUG_ISSUE_XYZ"))) so you
> would not even have to change code to re-enable the debugging code, just
> call options(DEBUG_ISSUE_XYX=TRUE)).
(a) The foregoing is getting too subtle for my feeble brain.
(b) A fundamental problem with the
if(FALSE) {
...
}
paradigm is that the enclosed...
2017 Sep 03
0
[FORGED] Re: Block comment?
...arbitrary text) that you want to be able to easily run the commented out
>> code? If so the 'if()' construct has the advantage that you only need to
>> change code at the start of the comment, not at both ends.
>>
>> The if(FALSE) could be if(isTRUE(getOption("DEBUG_ISSUE_XYZ"))) so you
>> would not even have to change code to re-enable the debugging code, just
>> call options(DEBUG_ISSUE_XYX=TRUE)).
>
>
> (a) The foregoing is getting too subtle for my feeble brain.
>
> (b) A fundamental problem with the
>
> if(FALSE) {
>...
2017 Sep 03
2
[FORGED] Re: Block comment?
...to be able to easily run the commented out
>>> code? If so the 'if()' construct has the advantage that you only
>>> need to
>>> change code at the start of the comment, not at both ends.
>>>
>>> The if(FALSE) could be if(isTRUE(getOption("DEBUG_ISSUE_XYZ"))) so you
>>> would not even have to change code to re-enable the debugging code, just
>>> call options(DEBUG_ISSUE_XYX=TRUE)).
>>
>>
>> (a) The foregoing is getting too subtle for my feeble brain.
>>
>> (b) A fundamental problem with the
>&g...
2017 Sep 02
4
Block comment?
AFAIK block comment is not possible
it needs to be implemented in R interpreter and defined in the
parser.'If' solution is not elegant.
On 2 September 2017 at 14:09, Uwe Ligges
<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 02.09.2017 11:40, Christian wrote:
>>
>> I consider it quite worth while to introduce into R syntax a nestable
>> block comment