search for: debug_abbrevs

On 5/21/20, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > I think the example looks like it would be really useful for many categories > of testcases! > Will it still be possible to manually specify the .debug_abbrev section when > this is desired after you are done? Yes, I think it works. There are two ways to edit the .debug_abbrev section. i) Edit the "Attr:" and

Hello all, it looks like we have a bug here but I am not sure. Currently if we have two similar types with implicit_const attributes and different values we end up with only one abbrev in .debug_abbrev section. For example consider two structures: S1 with implicit_const attribute ATTR and value VAL1 and S2 with implicit_const ATTR and value VAL2. The .debug_abbrev section will contain only 1

Hi folks, I am going to implement DWARF support for yaml2obj. I really appreciate it that many of you have given me a lot of useful comments and suggestions in the previous thread [1]. I've had some offline discussions with James and done some updates to the previous proposal. This proposal addresses the issue of properly describing the DWARF sections in YAML both at a high level and at a

Hi Pavel, Thanks for your comments! On 5/21/20, Pavel Labath <pavel at labath.sk> wrote: > Hello Xing, > > I think the proposal looks very useful. I think it will be fairly tricky > to get all of the details right though. There is a lot of "inferring" > going on there, and getting that to work reliably and with predictable > results will need careful

Context: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39862 I'm trying to enable stack traces in an OS kernel. To do that the kernel needs access to its own debug info. I have this in my linker script: .debug_info : { __debug_info_start = .; KEEP(*(.debug_info)) __debug_info_end = .; } .debug_abbrev : { __debug_abbrev_start = .;

Hi! TL;DR WDYT of adding zlib decompression capabilities to LLVMObject library? ld.gold from GNU binutils has --compress-debug-sections=zlib option, which uses zlib to compress .debug_xxx sections and renames them to .zdebug_xxx. binutils (and GDB) support this properly, while LLVM command line tools don't: $ ld --version GNU gold (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu 2.22) 1.11 $ ./bin/clang++ -g a.cc

...in code section (only in functions). c) Does not support label arithmetic in DWARF sections. “.b32 L1 – L2” as the size of the section is not allowed, so the sections sizes should be calculated explicitly. d) Debug info must point to the sections, not to labels inside these sections. “.b32 .debug_abbrevs” e) Sections itself must be enclosed into braces “.section .debug_info {…}” f) Frame info is non-register based Based on function local “__local_depot” array, that represents the stack frame. g) All variables must have non-standard DW_AT_address_class attribute so the debuger had the info a...

I believe the compiler will generate a .debug_ranges section if you use -ffunction-sections, since the addresses of sections will be non-contiguous. From there, you should be able to edit the .debug_ranges assembly as needed (replace references to symbols with 0s in the .debug_ranges content) to get the exact behaviour you want (I'm assuming you don't want to have to hand-edit a

Sorry, this is the attachment. 2014-02-19 15:08 GMT+08:00 杨勇勇 <triple.yang at gmail.com>: > Thank you. > > Here is an example and the attchment contains extra files including object > file and executable file. > I want to print for example the value of "a", but lldb command "frame > variable a" displays "0" and so does "b", and

I recently upgraded a codebase to use LLVM 3.9.0, up from 3.7.1. All seems to work well, except that I am unable to generate debug information. However, if I run objdump -g on the generated object file, it reports that the compile unit has no children: Contents of the .debug_abbrev section: Number TAG (0x0) 1 DW_TAG_compile_unit [no children] DW_AT_producer DW_FORM_strp

Here are the linker errors: lld: warning: libcygwin.a(_cygwin_crt0_common.o): undefined symbol: __data_start__ lld: warning: libcygwin.a(_cygwin_crt0_common.o): undefined symbol: __data_end__ lld: warning: libcygwin.a(_cygwin_crt0_common.o): undefined symbol: __bss_start__ lld: warning: libcygwin.a(_cygwin_crt0_common.o): undefined symbol: __bss_end__ lld: warning:

All of this information is contained in the DWARF debug info that you must generate. Are you generating DWARF? If not, you will need to. If so, please attach an example program that contains DWARF and specify which function you are having trouble getting variable information for. Greg Clayton On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:44 AM, 杨勇勇 <triple.yang at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, all > > I

Great, thanks! Those results are about roughly what I was expecting. I assume "compilation time" is actually just the link time? I find it particularly interesting that the DWARFLinker rewriting solution produces the same size improvement in .debug_line as the fragmented DWARF approach. That suggests that in that case, fragmented DWARF output is probably about as optimal as it can get.

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> TL;DR WDYT of adding zlib decompression capabilities to LLVMObject >> library? >> > >> ld.gold from GNU binutils has --compress-debug-sections=zlib option,

Are you perhaps not calling void Function::setSubprogram (DISubprogram * SP) http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Function.html#a05a19abc8ee11d5909275d980efa1670 ? -- adrian > On Nov 18, 2016, at 8:46 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > (+Adrian who might have some more context here) > > Generally I'd suggest looking at Clang's code to see how

...ted explicitly. > MachO has a similar restriction, this should not be a problem if you > can do something like: > L3 = L1 - L2 > .b32 L3 Nope, it is not supported >> d) Debug info must point to the sections, not to labels inside these >> sections. >>     “.b32 .debug_abbrevs” > Offhand for DWARF-2 I can't think of a reference that couldn't be done > this way. > >> e) Sections itself must be enclosed into braces >>     “.section .debug_info {…}” >> f) Frame info is non-register based >>     Based on function local “__local_depot”...

On 19.11.2020 03:21, Cary Coutant wrote: >>> If the .debug_str section *by itself* exceeds 4GB, then yes any string >>> with a 32-bit reference to it must be in the first 4GB. Strings that >>> have only 64-bit references to them can be sorted to the end of the >>> section, if necessary. I wouldn't think anyone guarantees or cares >>> about the

Is that the only problem to use lld to link cygwin programs? On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Andrew Kelley <superjoe30 at gmail.com> wrote: > Here are the linker errors: > > lld: warning: libcygwin.a(_cygwin_crt0_common.o): undefined symbol: > __data_start__ > lld: warning: libcygwin.a(_cygwin_crt0_common.o): undefined symbol: > __data_end__ > lld: warning:

Hi, all I ported llvm backend and lldb recently. Both tools can basically work. lldb is able to debug programs in asm style and frame unwinding is OK. But "frame variable XX" does not work because lldb is not able to determine the address of XX from debug info. Can someone give any clue? Thanks in advance. -- 杨勇勇 (Yang Yong-Yong) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote: > Hi! > > TL;DR WDYT of adding zlib decompression capabilities to LLVMObject library? > > ld.gold from GNU binutils has --compress-debug-sections=zlib option, > which uses zlib to compress .debug_xxx sections and renames them to > .zdebug_xxx. > binutils (and GDB) support this properly,