search for: debilitate

Hi, I have successfully gotten the libshout-2.0 release to compile under gcc/MingGW ('gcc -mno-cygwin', version 'gcc (GCC) 3.3.1 (cygming special)'), after applying Leigh Smith's patches as posted on this list (http://www.xiph.org/archives/icecast-dev/0660.html). I have then generated a dll and wrapped it in JNI using the stubs from libshout-java

We have been experiencing a debilitating 'bug' in samba where something is causing a flood of the messages seen below in smbstatus and the network drives ( in our case N: ) on all clients become unresponsive. In fact, the entire client becomes unresponsive, essentially making them unusable until samba is restarted. We first saw this and connected it to the following open bug in samba

Josh Coalson wrote: > for recent code changes I find myself needing some workarounds > for MSVC6: Yep. MSVC is borked. Its missing most of the new maths functions that were introduced in the C99 standard. The way I solved this problem for libsndfile was to stop using MSVC, (allowing it to break for that compiler) and use MinGW. I also release a pre-compiled win32 binary so

On 30/08/2019 02:52, David Walling via samba wrote: > We have been experiencing a debilitating 'bug' in samba where something is causing a flood of the messages seen below in smbstatus and the network drives ( in our case N: ) on all clients become unresponsive. In fact, the entire client becomes unresponsive, essentially making them unusable until samba is restarted. We first saw

for recent code changes I find myself needing some workarounds for MSVC6: 1st, I need a fast way to swap bytes (for endianness) of a 32-bit int. I could not find a builtin like bswap; the closest thing I found was ntohl() which appears to be a function call and also requires linking with winsock2 (ws2_32.lib) to get it. 2nd, I need an equivalent for lround() (or round() is ok), which is not in

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Scott Neugroschl <scott_n at xypro.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:02 PM, navern <livingdeadzerg at yandex.ru> wrote: > >> Is there any available tool with this for pre-evaluating the resulting sshd_config for fatal errors? I'm not demanding: I'm thinking "that could be really, really useful". > >

...nSSH to machines with SSH. Since sftp does not contain commands allowing for the transfer of entire directories / multiple files, this is severely crippling the work they are trying to do. Moving from SSH to OpenSSH on the server is not an option, as there are other bugs in OpenSSH that would debilitate the server in other transactions it makes. So is this bug/feature known, and are there any sensible workarounds / timetable when scp will attempt to use the subsystem sftp on v. 2 servers before falling back to old scp1 behavior? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are...

I left in some of the parameters I've been testing commented out. Interestingly, we've noticed another client triggering the same type of symptoms every morning at around the same time. Those symptoms being a line 'lookup_name_smbconf for COMPUTERNAME$ failed' and a flood of failed connection attempts from the same client. The issue seemed to resolve itself after a few minutes

RC 2 is now available for testing (Early RC1 testing on a RedHat-based system with dynamic provider gateways uncovered a couple of debilitating defects in the enable/disable logic). Thank you for testing, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in

RC 2 is now available for testing (Early RC1 testing on a RedHat-based system with dynamic provider gateways uncovered a couple of debilitating defects in the enable/disable logic). Thank you for testing, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in

I realize I am one of the few who uses the segment registers (especially CS and DS) on the ia32 chips for example, and a definite few with complete segregation models that rival specialized physical processors... GCC still fails to use these correctly and if your LLVM still depends on either Generic or some of the RTL models they use in various processor definitions, I express concern for

Hey so, People are asking about Mongrel Ruby 1.9 compatibility. Isn''t the point of 1.9 for library developers to have time to get ready for 2.0? It''s not like 1.9 is a production release. Evan -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59168 Priority: medium Bug ID: 59168 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [nvc3/Quadro2000M] graphic garbage/corruption/noise on resume QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: major Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)