search for: debiantesting

Hello, I''ve installed on a debian squeeze server, xen 4 with one VM which run in route mode configuration with an IP failover. I wanted to create another VM which turn in nat mode, so I make that : - I let my xend-config.sxp with : (network-script ''network-route netdev=eth0'') (vif-script vif-route) because my first VM is the most important.... For the second, I

Hi all, ive been using the nano howto to load balance to adsl links for a good while now ive got our live server running kernel 2.6.11.6 and these links work fine. i set up another server same model of machine and used the same kernel config ( wanted to try some tos stuff out) 2.6.11.6 but this one doesnt balance properly. what ever i put in table 222 (which is looked at from all sources) it

hi, I modified my file named.conf.options . When i use dig lenzspitze2.calais.fr I get an answer which contain answer section, authority section and additional section. I haven't map "Domain users" into "user" When I execute samba -i i have always the message error or warning ? /usr/sbin/smbd: pid_to_procid: messaging_dgm_get_unique failed: Aucun fichier ou dossier de

Hello group, I have 2 Samba PCDs w/ LDAP + winbind called FILESERVER and FUNDUS-SRV for the domains PROFICON and FUNDUS, respectively. In PROFICON I created a trust account for FUNDUS using net rpc trustdom add FUNDUS <passwd> -U proficon\\administrator which creates the LDAP entry: dn: uid=FUNDUS$,ou=Computers,dc=office,dc=proficon,dc=sk uid: FUNDUS$ sambaSID:

On 14/05/2019 09:27, nathalie ramat via samba wrote: > hi, > > I modified my file named.conf.options . > When i use dig lenzspitze2.calais.fr I get an answer which contain > answer section, authority section and additional section. > > I haven't map "Domain users" into "user" > > I recover the last number of sid for the uidnumber and the last

Hello, on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:13:19 -0800 Eric Woltermann posted: > for some weeks now I am trying to set up Samba4 (alpha9) with an OpenLDAP 2.4.17 backend as an AD PDC for my XP/7 clients. It was working for some time with Samba's integrated LDAP facility, however I could not figure out how to use this database e.g. to authenticate my IMAP users against (bind-dn, port etc.). OpenLDAP

Hello, Sorry for my english and for this very long email. I want to create samba-ad server with the package debian buster. I have follow the url : https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/blob/master/howtos/stretch-base-2.0-samba-minimal-ad.txt I have generated mon samba ad with the following command : samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive Realm [LENZSPITZE2.CALAIS.FR]: Domain

Am 2016-11-25 um 10:31 schrieb Mike Lykov via samba: > 25.11.2016 13:12, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba пишет: > >> I assume later samba-releases would help around these issues so I wonder >> if there are any more recent packages available anywhere. I would like >> to avoid compiling samba on my own, not because I am not able to do that >> but in terms of lower

Hai Nathalie, The generation/provioning is ok. The "local SID message is normal, that because your joining the domain and havent started samba at that point. You can ignore that. Did you install and configure bind9? The provisioning command shows that you are setting up with it. But this shows bind is not found, which is a bit off. > BIND version unknown, please modify >

hi, My user must be able to connect under windows and under linux. The home is common. Their home is on the server. Like there are students - they are identified by their formation( group) and by their login for example /home/specifique/testlundi                   /home/l1info/testmardi For me the etudiant belong to a group  and i have create each group on OU and i take the last number

Hi all. I experienced a strange behaviour in the "arp" command when I use the "pub" (publishing) flag. This is the scenario (I know it''s an unusual one, but it''s just for a test): __________ | | | host C | | | |__________| | __________|________________________________

Friends, We have a discussion on asterisk-dev about the maintenance of the 1.4 branch. According to the release plans, support for 1.4 was scheduled to close in April 2011 - basically now. After that, only security patches would be committed. This is already a delay from the original plan published by Russell Bryant. Unfortunately, I think this is way too early. My feeling and experience is that