search for: debian_revision

It's not exactly a problem but Debian supports an epoch. The format is like this: [epoch:]upstream_version[-debian_revision] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version Right now if a package has a version like this: 1:1.2.3-1, libguestfs will translate it as: epoch=0 version = 1:1.2.3 release=1 The same thing does my patch for pacman. If we are to leave it like this, then it makes more...

...ernel image I''ve install build-essential and libc6-dev. Features.h definitely exists in /usr/include/ I''m using gcc-3.3 but I''ve also tried gcc-4.0. Obviously I''m missing something obvious, any help would be appreciated. Thanks muchly. Joel exec debian/rules DEBIAN_REVISION=2.6.12.6-xen-smbfs-10.00.Custom APPEND_TO_VERSION=.6-xen-smbfs KPKG_ARCH=xen kernel_image In file included from include/linux/posix_types.h:47, from include/linux/types.h:13, from include/linux/capability.h:16, from include/linux/sched.h:7,...

I manually downloaded the rpart package and installed it using dpkg, without removing the old rpart package first, and now everything works. During the installation, dpkg said: Unpacking r-cran-rpart (4.1-13-1cran1xenial0) over (4.1-13-1cran1xenial0) So again, it seemed that the new version had been installed, but it really wasn?t. I had no idea that something like this could happen. Huh.

The old (3.4) repo has the same version or rpart (with the same package filename), which I assume was the version installed on my machine prior to my upgrade to 3.5. I guess apt didn?t upgrade because there was no version change. Maybe the debian_revision part of the version could be bumped to make sure the rebuilt packages are upgraded for people upgrading from the 3.4 repo? > On 16 Aug 2018, at 07:35, Ulrich KELLER <ulrich.keller at uni.lu> wrote: > > I manually downloaded the rpart package and installed it using dpkg, without rem...

OK, I'll try to fix the epoch thing for all three. Nikos On 17 November 2014 13:49, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01:41:28PM +0200, Nikos Skalkotos wrote: >> OK, I'll make the suggested changes and I'll try to come up with a new >> patch by tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. I just noticed that a >> space is

...<ulrich.keller at uni.lu> wrote: > The old (3.4) repo has the same version or rpart (with the same package > filename), which I assume was the version installed on my machine prior to > my upgrade to 3.5. I guess apt didn?t upgrade because there was no version > change. Maybe the debian_revision part of the version could be bumped to > make sure the rebuilt packages are upgraded for people upgrading from the > 3.4 repo? > The package system really should ensure that older packages get replaced when there are rebuilt versions. I do recall seeing instructions to remove all the cur...