search for: debian11

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 23 matches for "debian11".

Did you mean: debian10
2023 Jan 16
2
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
Hi to all, Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors with the "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names". If I install Bind9 in version 9.16 everything works. I have the whole thing running in a Vagrant environment and can
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
On 16/01/2023 19:55, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Ah, ok, just saw it. Sorry, I missed that. > > I can only add then, all three DC's in my little net are installed with > bind 9.18 and working all the same without errors. That would tend to dispel my worries, so it is possible that it is some misconfiguration on Stefan's machine. I know I once joined a DC and forgot the
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
As I said, both DC are installed via Vagrent, starting the setup with 9.18 I have the problem, starting with 9.16 everything is running. The configuration is always the same. Am 16.01.23 um 21:36 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > On 16/01/2023 19:55, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: >> Ah, ok, just saw it. Sorry, I missed that. >> >> I can only add then, all three
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
On 16/01/2023 20:52, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > As I said, both DC are installed via Vagrent, starting the setup with > 9.18 I have the problem, starting with 9.16 everything is running. The > configuration is always the same. > > I am getting confused now (not that it takes much) Are you saying that none of your 4.17.x DC's work with Bind 9.18 ? Ingo seems to be
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
That's exactly what I'm saying. I can add output from all three DC's if necessary. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um 22:02: > > > On 16/01/2023 20:52, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> As I said, both DC are installed via Vagrent, starting the setup with >> 9.18 I have the problem, starting with 9.16
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Hi to all, > Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba > packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports > (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors with > the "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names". > > If I install Bind9 in version
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
Ah, ok, just saw it. Sorry, I missed that. I can only add then, all three DC's in my little net are installed with bind 9.18 and working all the same without errors. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Stefan Kania via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um 20:47: > > > Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> I have exact that running:
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> Hi to all, >> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba >> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports >> (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors >> with the
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > > > Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> >> >> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>> Hi to all, >>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba >>> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
On 16/01/2023 18:56, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> >>> >>> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>>> Hi to all, >>>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
Hi Stefan, I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the bullseye-backports. I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors. As like 9.16 I use the "dlz_bind9_18.so" entry in named.conf. If you need further information to compare just ask. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um
2023 Jan 16
1
Debian11 Samba backport and bind9
Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba: > Hi Stefan, > > I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the > bullseye-backports. > > I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors. > On the first DC it's running like I expacted, but on the second one I'm having the provlem. > As like 9.16 I use the
2023 Jul 14
1
Test-ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose False since windows 10/11 update 07/2023
Where to get the patch? We are running samba 4.17.4 on debian11 . We compiled from source. Greetings Daniel -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Ralph Boehme via samba [mailto:samba at lists.samba.org] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Juli 2023 18:40 An: samba <samba at lists.samba.org> Betreff: Re: [Samba] Test-ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose False since wi...
2023 Jul 14
1
Test-ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose False since windows 10/11 update 07/2023
On 7/14/23 07:42, Daniel M?ller wrote: > Where to get the patch? > We are running samba 4.17.4 on debian11 . We compiled from source. it's linked in the bugreport https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15418 <https://cpaste.org/?df0494cac0063e2e#Cx69G684EBPQ71S6sAUVXSYburgV6gPyKHfPSbfmHZPJ> Hth! -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/ SerNet Samba Te...
2023 Jul 14
1
Test-ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose False since windows 10/11 update 07/2023
On 7/14/23 09:41, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > On 7/14/23 07:42, Daniel M?ller wrote: >> Where to get the patch? >> We are running samba 4.17.4 on debian11 . We compiled from source. > > it's linked in the bugreport > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15418 > > <https://cpaste.org/?df0494cac0063e2e#Cx69G684EBPQ71S6sAUVXSYburgV6gPyKHfPSbfmHZPJ> fwiw, I've also added a proper patchfile to the bugreport. Ch...
2023 Sep 15
1
virtio-mem with virt-install to share memory between guest and host on-demand
...test --cpu cell0.cpus=0,cell0.memory=4194304,cell1.cpus=1,cell1.memory=4194304 --memory maxMemory=65536,maxMemory.slots=8 --memdev model=virtio-mem,target.node=0,target.block=2048,target.size=1000 --disk size=400 --network network=ai --location=/tmp/debian-12.1.0-amd64-netinst.iso --os-variant=debian11 --graphics none --extra-args "console=ttyS0 Best wishes, Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_0xCFC60FFCAAEC3A7D.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 1310 bytes Desc: OpenPGP public key URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archive...
2023 Sep 20
1
virtio-mem with virt-install to share memory between guest and host on-demand
...0.cpus=0,cell0.memory=4194304,cell1.cpus=1,cell1.memory=4194304 --memory > maxMemory=65536,maxMemory.slots=8 --memdev > model=virtio-mem,target.node=0,target.block=2048,target.size=1000 --disk > size=400 --network network=ai > --location=/tmp/debian-12.1.0-amd64-netinst.iso --os-variant=debian11 > --graphics none --extra-args "console=ttyS0 When using PCI device assignment, the VFIO driver requires that libvit pin guest memory into RAM https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/19484ccac5cb1586f9d10d3e6eb9b93ee82885c6/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c#L9567 so that's why you'll se...
2024 Feb 16
2
samba 4.19 Windows 11 clients Time sync problem
...ve a samba 4.19 domain running. And what i recognized ist hat some windows 10/11 clients does not sync time with the dc. The time is not the real time as on the dc, about 10 minutes back or several minutes in the future. Is this a bug or did spmething chance in the behaviour of samba? My ntp.conf/ Debian11: driftfile /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift server 127.127.1.0 fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 10 leapfile "/usr/share/zoneinfo/leap-seconds.list" ntpsigndsocket /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd <--- rights are set listen xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx statistics loopstats peerstats clockstats filegen loopstats file loop...
2024 Feb 16
1
samba 4.19 Windows 11 clients Time sync problem
...g. And what i recognized ist hat some > windows 10/11 clients does not sync time with the dc. The time is not the > real time as on the dc, about 10 minutes back or several minutes in the > future. > Is this a bug or did spmething chance in the behaviour of samba? > > My ntp.conf/ Debian11: > driftfile /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift > > server 127.127.1.0 > fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 10 > leapfile "/usr/share/zoneinfo/leap-seconds.list" > > ntpsigndsocket /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd <--- rights are set > listen xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > statistics loopstats peerst...
2024 Feb 26
1
samba 4.19 Windows 11 clients Time sync problem
...And what i recognized ist > hat some windows 10/11 clients does not sync time with the dc. The > time is not the real time as on the dc, about 10 minutes back or > several minutes in the future. > Is this a bug or did spmething chance in the behaviour of samba? > > My ntp.conf/ Debian11: > driftfile /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift > > server 127.127.1.0 > fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 10 > leapfile "/usr/share/zoneinfo/leap-seconds.list" > > ntpsigndsocket /var/lib/samba/ntp_signd <--- rights are set listen > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx statistics loopstats peerstats...