search for: debabrata

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 29 matches for "debabrata".

2009 Mar 12
4
Windows binary version of DPpackage
...Windows binary of DPpackage from source? 2. Is there any possibility to have a copy of Windows binary of DPpackage in the near future in the site http://www.cran.r-project.org/? Once again, thank you very much for the time you have given. I am looking forward for your reply. Regards, Debabrata Midya (Deb) NSW Department of Commerce Government Procurement Management Level 11 McKell Building 2-24 Rawson Place Sydney NSW 2000 Australia ****************************************************************************** This email message, including any attached files, is confidential and inten...
2009 Sep 30
1
How to change e-mail address
...sages such as "Your message to R-help awaits moderator approval". I need your assistance on above. I am an user of r-help. My e-mail address has been changed due to the new name of our Department. My previous e-mail address (When I have subscribed to r-help by sending an e-mail): debabrata.midya@commerce.nsw.gov.au My current e-mail address: Debabrata.Midya@services.nsw.gov.au Regards, Deb [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2009 Mar 31
2
To save Trellis Plots on A3 size paper (Portrait and Landscape)
...sep=":") barchart(s ~ time| xc + xo, data = dataFile[dataFile$xo == 'x1', ], horizontal = FALSE, groups = id, layout = c(1, 6)) dev.off() Once again, thank you very much for the time you have given. I am looking forward for your reply. Regards, Debabrata Midya (Deb) NSW Department of Commerce Government Procurement Management Level 11 McKell Building 2-24 Rawson Place Sydney NSW 2000 Australia ****************************************************************************** This email message, including any attached files, is confidential and int...
2014 Jan 08
2
[PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 21:18 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:26:03AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 20:08 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > Eric said we also need a patch to add __GFP_NORETRY, right? > > > Probably before this one in series. > > > > Nope, this __GFP_NORETRY has nothing to do
2014 Jan 08
2
[PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 21:18 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:26:03AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 20:08 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > Eric said we also need a patch to add __GFP_NORETRY, right? > > > Probably before this one in series. > > > > Nope, this __GFP_NORETRY has nothing to do
2014 Jan 03
2
[PATCH net-next 1/3] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
...rarely without these two pieces of code. I hotpatched a running system to get results from this quickly. Even setting the max order to order-1 I still see bad behavior. If anything this behavior should be conditional until this is ironed out. Performance data: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/6687527/ -Debabrata
2014 Jan 03
2
[PATCH net-next 1/3] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
...rarely without these two pieces of code. I hotpatched a running system to get results from this quickly. Even setting the max order to order-1 I still see bad behavior. If anything this behavior should be conditional until this is ironed out. Performance data: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/6687527/ -Debabrata
2014 Jan 08
0
[PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
...ends up constantly reclaiming and trying to keep another 1-2GB free on our systems (8GB phys ~4GB left for kernel, ~3GB optimally used for page_cache). 4. I think perhaps using a kmem_cache allocation for this buffer is the right way to make this work. I am experimenting with a patch to do this. -Debabrata -Debabrata
2009 Sep 14
1
64-bit binary for Windows
Dear R Users, Thanks in advance. I am currently using R-2.9.1-win32.exe on Windows XP. Is there any 64 bit binary on Windows XP? Once again, thank you very much for the time you have given. Regards, Deb ****************************************************************************** This email message, including any attached files, is confidential and intended solely for the use of
2014 Jan 03
2
[PATCH net-next 1/3] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 16:56 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > My suggestion is to use a recent kernel, and/or eventually backport the > mm fixes if any. > > order-3 allocations should not reclaim 2GB out of 8GB. > > There is a reason PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER exists and is 3 Hmm... it looks like I missed __GFP_NORETRY diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index
2014 Jan 03
2
[PATCH net-next 1/3] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 16:56 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > My suggestion is to use a recent kernel, and/or eventually backport the > mm fixes if any. > > order-3 allocations should not reclaim 2GB out of 8GB. > > There is a reason PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER exists and is 3 Hmm... it looks like I missed __GFP_NORETRY diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index
2014 Jan 03
2
[PATCH net-next 1/3] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
...e (read: not utilized). Order > 0 allocations were happening rarely before, now it happens consistently from this function. My suggestion above would avoid mm going through __alloc_pages_direct_compact() and triggering the bad events above. It will take me several days to try this experiment. -Debabrata On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 5:46 PM, David Miller <davem at davemloft.net> wrote: > > There is still feedback and/or minor adjustments being asked for wrt. > this series. These changes have been sitting for more than a week > which is a bit rediculous. > > Please resubmit the...
2014 Jan 03
2
[PATCH net-next 1/3] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
...e (read: not utilized). Order > 0 allocations were happening rarely before, now it happens consistently from this function. My suggestion above would avoid mm going through __alloc_pages_direct_compact() and triggering the bad events above. It will take me several days to try this experiment. -Debabrata On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 5:46 PM, David Miller <davem at davemloft.net> wrote: > > There is still feedback and/or minor adjustments being asked for wrt. > this series. These changes have been sitting for more than a week > which is a bit rediculous. > > Please resubmit the...
2007 Aug 21
2
Stacked Bar
...ovide 15 different colors for each method with 15 Rows? 2. How can I put the legend in a particular position (eg., in the top or bottom or right or left)? How can I put legend using a number of rows (eg., using two or three rows)? Once again thank you very much for your time. Regards, Debabrata (Deb) Statistician NSW Department of CommerceSydney, Australia. The Code: library(lattice) library(graphics) x <- matrix(1:75, ncol= 5) dimnames(x)[[2]] <- paste("Method", 1:5, sep="") dimnames(x)[[1]] <- paste("Row", 1:15, sep="")...
2007 Jul 07
0
Calling R function in C
...s! Thanks in advance. I am using R-2.5.1 on Windows XP and I have installed all necessary tools such as perl and tools.exe. I am trying to use sample(1:100, 3, rep=F) in C. How can I use this R function in C? Once again thank you very much for your time. Regards, Debabrata (Deb) Statistician NSW Department of Commerce Sydney, Australia. --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2009 Jul 08
1
Density value over 1 using density function
Dear R users, Thanks in advance. I am using R 2.9.1 on Windows XP. In the plot, the density value displays over 1. How can I explain it? library(urca) plot(density(Raotbl1[, 1])) Once again, thank you very much for the time you have given. I am looking forward for your reply. Regards, Deb ****************************************************************************** This email
2014 Jan 03
0
[PATCH net-next 1/3] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 19:42 -0500, Debabrata Banerjee wrote: > Currently because of how mm behaves (3.10.y) the code even before the > patch is a problem. I believe what may fix it is if instead of just > removing the conditional on __GFP_WAIT, the initial order > 0 > allocation should be made GFP_ATOMIC, then fallback to the o...
2014 Jan 03
0
[PATCH net-next 1/3] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
...;t free an order-3. Now have all cpu's doing a send(), you can still get heavy spinlock contention in the routines described above. The major change I see here is that allocations > order-0 used to be rare, now it's on every send(). I can try your patch to see how much things improve. -Debabrata
2014 Jan 03
0
[PATCH net-next 1/3] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 17:47 -0500, Debabrata Banerjee wrote: > >> On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 16:56 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> > >> Hmm... it looks like I missed __GFP_NORETRY > >> > >> > >> > >> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c > >> index 5393b4b719d7..5f42a...
2007 Jul 04
1
Calling C Code from R
...testCX1.c:38: warning: implicit declaration of function 'func' How to get rid off this error ? What is the best way to call funcC1.c from testCX1.c? I have provided the codes below: Once again thank you very much for the time you have given. Regards, Debabrata Midya (Deb) Statistician NSW Department of Commerce Sydney, Australia testCX1.C -------------- /* ********************* testCX1.c ********************* */ #include <R.h> #include <Rdefines.h> #include <Rmath.h> SEXP testC1(SEXP a) { int i, nr;...