search for: deb12u1

...cmd with -UAdministrator but the same error appears. >> >> Is this normal? >> If yes where to configure this permissions? > What version of Samba are you using, there have been a few updates in > the area that is failing for you. ii? samba??????????????????? 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 amd64 SMB/CIFS file, print, and login server for Unix ii? samba-ad-provision?????? 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 all Samba files needed for AD domain provision un? samba-client???????????? <none> <none>?????? (no description available) ii? samba-common???????????? 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1...

...but the same error appears. >>> >>> Is this normal? >>> If yes where to configure this permissions? >> What version of Samba are you using, there have been a few updates in >> the area that is failing for you. > ii? samba??????????????????? 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 amd64 SMB/CIFS > file, print, and login server for Unix > ii? samba-ad-provision?????? 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 all Samba files > needed for AD domain provision > un? samba-client???????????? <none> <none>?????? (no description > available) > ii? samba-common???????...

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 09:03:10 +0200 Jaros?aw K?opotek - INTERDUO via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I run cmd: > samba-tool gpo manage scripts startup add \ > {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} \ > /var/lib/samba/sysvol/fartest.local/scripts/startup.bat Are you running the command as root or with sudo ? > > with result: > [cut] >

...ticed that there's a xen upload in the stable-new queue, which > claims to have been uploaded by you. > > I'm afraid that we can't accept it currently, because it is a newer > version than is currently in unstable and testing: > > xen | 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 | stable | source > xen | 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 | stable-debug | source > xen | 4.17.3+36-g54dacb5c02-1 | testing | source > xen | 4.17.3+36-g54dacb5c02-1 | unstable | source > xen | 4.17.3+36-g...

Hi, I noticed that there's a xen upload in the stable-new queue, which claims to have been uploaded by you. I'm afraid that we can't accept it currently, because it is a newer version than is currently in unstable and testing: xen | 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 | stable | source xen | 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 | stable-debug | source xen | 4.17.3+36-g54dacb5c02-1 | testing | source xen | 4.17.3+36-g54dacb5c02-1 | unstable | source xen | 4.17.3+36-g54dacb5c02-1...

...t/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++-========================-========================-============-==================================== ii samba 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 amd64 SMB/CIFS file, print, and login serv ii samba-ad-provision 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 all Samba files needed for AD domain pro ii samba-common 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 all common files used by both the Samba ii samba-common-bin 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 amd64 Samba c...

...t; >>> > >>> Is this normal? > >>> If yes where to configure this permissions? > >> What version of Samba are you using, there have been a few updates > >> in the area that is failing for you. > > ii? samba??????????????????? 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 amd64 > > SMB/CIFS file, print, and login server for Unix > > ii? samba-ad-provision?????? 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 all Samba > > files needed for AD domain provision > > un? samba-client???????????? <none> <none>?????? (no description > > available) >...

...t;> bug report, which also mentions that. >> >> We're running into problems with 4.17.5-1 for unstable, which is most >> likely related to compatibility issues with newer ocaml in unstable. > > We now have 4.19.1 in unstable, and after DSA 5836-1, both 4.17.5- > 1~deb12u1 and 4.17.5+23-ga4e5191dc0-1 in stable-new. Should the former > be rejected in favour of the version from the DSA? > > I'm tempted to leave the packages in stable-new in any case until the > new version manages to migrate to testing, just to avoid any potential Sorry for the confus...

...sing the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: samba : Breaks: samba-ad-dc (< 2:4.20.1+dfsg-2~) but 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 is to be installed Breaks: samba-ad-provision (< 2:4.20.5+dfsg) but 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 is to be installed E: Broken packages The following packages are installed: roy at moggy:~$ sudo dpkg -l | grep samba ii libldb2:amd64 2:2.9.1+samba4.20.5+dfsg-1~bpo12+1...

...tion that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > samba : Breaks: samba-ad-dc (< 2:4.20.1+dfsg-2~) but 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 is to be installed > Breaks: samba-ad-provision (< 2:4.20.5+dfsg) but 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 is to be installed > E: Broken packages For a member server, you don't need samba-ad-dc or samba-ad-provision, - you can uninstall these just fine (probably together with samba-dsd...

...such? How do I find who (possible libnss-winbind?) rejects some of the AD users? Enable some PAM debug? /var/log/samba and journalctl revealed nothing to my eyes. Steffen Diagnostics: # apt install -y libpam-winbind libnss-winbind libpam-winbind is already the newest version (2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1). libnss-winbind is already the newest version (2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1). 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. It appears in PAM: root at a2samba2:~# grep winbind /etc/pam.d/* /etc/pam.d/common-account:account [success=1 new_authtok_reqd=done default=ignore]...

...ishing the accompanying bts > bug report, which also mentions that. > > We're running into problems with 4.17.5-1 for unstable, which is most > likely related to compatibility issues with newer ocaml in unstable. We now have 4.19.1 in unstable, and after DSA 5836-1, both 4.17.5- 1~deb12u1 and 4.17.5+23-ga4e5191dc0-1 in stable-new. Should the former be rejected in favour of the version from the DSA? I'm tempted to leave the packages in stable-new in any case until the new version manages to migrate to testing, just to avoid any potential version skew issues as we're not far...

tags 988477 - moreinfo found 988477 4.17.2+76-ge1f9cb16e2-1~deb12u1 affects 988477 src:linux severity 988477 critical quit I am also observing #988477 occur. This machine has a AMD Zen 4 processor. The first observation was when motherboard/processor was swapped out, the older motherboard/processor was several generations old. The pattern which is emerging is L...

found 988477 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 severity 988477 critical quit Justification is same as original, data loss. I'm unsure about of the border between "data loss" and "serious data loss" is, but the original reportter declared it so and I don't disagree. On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 11:41:44PM +0200, Maximi...

...04, MATYAS, Tibor via samba: > Dear all, > > updating openssl from 1.1.x to 3.x on our gentoo systems (recompiled everything against the new openssl!) > breaks kinit: FWIW, most distributions switched to openssl3 quite some time ago. Eg, current libssl in Debian is of version 3.0.11-1~deb12u1. You did not provide any other useful info. Two of the most important missing pieces: do you build samba with the recommended heimdal kerberos or mit-krb5? And what's your DC? /mjt

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > found 1092495 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 Bug #1092495 [src:xen] linux-image-amd64: xz compression incompatible with Xen/pygrub Marked as found in versions xen/4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1092495: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092...

On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:33:59 +0100 Steffen Dettmer via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > after I setup one working Samba today, I tried to do exactly the same > in another domain. > I created a privileged debian12 container and installed samba. > I have a MS Win driven AD (3 DCs). First I had not all in upper case > in krb.conf. I learnt uppercase is

...source of ntpsec, take the version from Trixie. replace (some of) the dependencies with those of Bookworm and build the package. Debian's ntpsec versions: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ntpsec/-/tags Check the dependency differences between release 1.2.3+dfsg1-3 (Trixie) and 1.2.2+dfsg1-1+deb12u1 (Bookworm). - Kees. > >

Hello, I come to you after several days of research about my problem: I cannot make windows clients join my Samba AD domain anymore. My domain is built with two Samba AD DCs, dc1 and dc2, that are both debian 12.6 up to date and use the debian samba packages (4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1). dc1 has all FSMO roles. When I try to make a Windows computer join the domain, I get an error saying the domain could not be contacted. Logs are: C:\Windows\debug\dcdiag.txt: --- DNS was successfully queried for the service location (SRV) resource record used to locate a domain controller for...

...some of the AD > users? Enable some PAM debug? /var/log/samba and journalctl revealed > nothing to my eyes. > > Steffen > > > > Diagnostics: > > # apt install -y libpam-winbind libnss-winbind > libpam-winbind is already the newest version > (2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1). libnss-winbind is already the newest > version (2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1). 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 > to remove and 0 not upgraded. It isn't the newest version available, you can get 4.19.5 from bookworm-backports. Not that this has anything to do with your problem. > >...