Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ddickison".
Did you mean:
dickison
2010 Nov 17
2
Bug in agrep computing edit distance?
I posted this yesterday to r-help and Ben Bolker suggested reposting it
here...
Dickison, Daniel <ddickison <at> carnegielearning.com> writes:
>
> The documentation for agrep says it uses the Levenshtein edit distance,
> but it seems to get this wrong in certain cases when there is a
> combination of deletions and substitutions. For example:
>
> > agrep("abcd", &...
2010 Nov 16
1
Bug in agrep computing edit distance?
...6_64-apple-darwin9.8.0/x86_64 (64-bit)
locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] tools_2.12.0
Daniel Dickison
Research Programmer
ddickison at carnegielearning.com
Toll Free: (888) 851-7094 x103
FAX: (412) 690-2444
Revolutionary Math Curricula. Revolutionary Results.
Carnegie Learning, Inc. | 437 Grant St. 20th Floor | Pittsburgh, PA 15219
www.carnegielearning.com
2011 Jan 11
2
aggregate.formula implicitly removes rows containing NA
The documentation for `aggregate` makes it sound like aggregate.formula should behave identically to aggregate.data.frame (apart from the way the parameters are passed). But it looks like aggregate.formula is quietly removing rows where any of the "output" variables (those on the LHS of the formula) are NA. This differs from how aggregate.data.frame works. Is this expected behavior?