Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ddf0a89".
Did you mean:
dd0fa89
2023 Apr 13
2
[PATCH v3 6/6] RFC: spec: Introduce NBD_REPLY_TYPE_OFFSET_HOLE_EXT
...ion, rather than our current
inherent 32-bit limit of NBD_INFO_BLOCK_SIZE, at the same time as we
introduce this reply type.
---
doc/proto.md | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/proto.md b/doc/proto.md
index ddf0a89..9fa471a 100644
--- a/doc/proto.md
+++ b/doc/proto.md
@@ -2024,18 +2024,27 @@ small amount of fixed-length overhead inherent in the chunk type).
64 bits: offset (unsigned)
32 bits: hole size (unsigned, MUST be nonzero)
- At this time, although servers that support extended headers are
-...
2023 Apr 13
6
[PATCH v3 0/6] NBD 64-bit extensions (spec only)
v2 was here:
https://lists.debian.org/nbd/2022/11/msg00030.html
The bulk of the changes since then are:
- forbid NBD_OPT_EXPORT_NAME once extended headers are negotiated (Wouter)
- consistently use 'maximum payload', rather than a haphazard mix of
'maximum block payload' (Vladimir)
At this point, I want to make sure we are happy with the spec before
re-posting patches for