search for: dcmake_make_program

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "dcmake_make_program".

Did you mean: cmake_make_program
2019 Jun 08
2
Help Building LLVM for Android
Hey Guys, I'm working on a project in Android related to System-level Audio DSP Effects for Tuning Android Audio. I want to leverage Faust ( https://faust.grame.fr/) to allow users to program their own filters. Faust provides a libfaust implementation which includes a JIT Compiler which leverages LLVM and seems to be the best path for me to use. Unfortunately I'm having problems
2015 Jul 28
2
[LLVMdev] Regression testing on MSYS2 host with mingw-w64
...d? > Yes it is turned on in my build here is my build script PATH=/mingw64/bin:$PATH FFI_INCLUDE_DIR="$(pkg-config --cflags libffi)" > FFI_INCLUDE_DIR=$(echo $FFI_INCLUDE_DIR | sed 's|-I||g') > > /mingw64/bin/cmake.exe \ > -G"MSYS Makefiles" \ > -DCMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM="/usr/bin/make.exe" \ > -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="/mingw64/bin/gcc.exe" \ > -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="/mingw64/bin/g++.exe" \ > -DFFI_INCLUDE_DIR="${FFI_INCLUDE_DIR}" \ > -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="${CFLAGS}" \ > -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="${CXXFL...
2015 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] Regression testing on MSYS2 host with mingw-w64
...t; here is my build script > > PATH=/mingw64/bin:$PATH > > FFI_INCLUDE_DIR="$(pkg-config --cflags libffi)" >> FFI_INCLUDE_DIR=$(echo $FFI_INCLUDE_DIR | sed 's|-I||g') >> >> /mingw64/bin/cmake.exe \ >> -G"MSYS Makefiles" \ >> -DCMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM="/usr/bin/make.exe" \ >> -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="/mingw64/bin/gcc.exe" \ >> -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="/mingw64/bin/g++.exe" \ >> -DFFI_INCLUDE_DIR="${FFI_INCLUDE_DIR}" \ >> -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="${CFLAGS}" \ >> -DCMAKE_CXX...
2015 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] Regression testing on MSYS2 host with mingw-w64
This test results in UNSUPPORTED on my system, since config.enable_ffi = "OFF". This is the result of LLVM_ENABLE_FFI which is OFF by default. Is it turned ON in your build? 2015-07-28 17:32 GMT+03:00 Martell Malone <martellmalone at gmail.com>: > Hi Yaron, > > I know you sent me some emails before about regression testing on MSYS2 > So you might have some idea about
2015 Jul 28
2
[LLVMdev] Regression testing on MSYS2 host with mingw-w64
Hi Yaron, I know you sent me some emails before about regression testing on MSYS2 So you might have some idea about this I am getting a regression error on check-llvm. With the llvm/trunk/test/ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/intrinsics.ll FAIL: LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/intrinsics.ll (7635 of 14266) > ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: >
2016 Jun 09
9
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory)
...NTDIR} > > + -DLLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX=${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX} > > + -DLLVM_ENABLE_WERROR=${LLVM_ENABLE_WERROR} > > + -DPACKAGE_VERSION=${PACKAGE_VERSION} > > + -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=${CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE} > > + -DCMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM=${CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM} > > How did you decide which variables need to be passed through like this? > The set seems somewhat arbitrary, but I may be missing something > obvious. > > > ${ARG_CMAKE_ARGS} > > ${PASSTHROUGH_VARIABLES} > >...
2016 Jun 09
2
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory)
...-DLLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX=${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX} >>> > + -DLLVM_ENABLE_WERROR=${LLVM_ENABLE_WERROR} >>> > + -DPACKAGE_VERSION=${PACKAGE_VERSION} >>> > + -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=${CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE} >>> > + -DCMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM=${CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM} >>> >>> How did you decide which variables need to be passed through like this? >>> The set seems somewhat arbitrary, but I may be missing something >>> obvious. >>> >>> > ${ARG_CMAKE_ARGS} >>>...
2016 Jun 10
4
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory)
...DIR_SUFFIX} >>>>> > + -DLLVM_ENABLE_WERROR=${LLVM_ENABLE_WERROR} >>>>> > + -DPACKAGE_VERSION=${PACKAGE_VERSION} >>>>> > + -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=${CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE} >>>>> > + -DCMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM=${CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM} >>>>> >>>>> How did you decide which variables need to be passed through like this? >>>>> The set seems somewhat arbitrary, but I may be missing something >>>>> obvious. >>>>> >>>>> &gt...