search for: dcge1

...com > seems to exist. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > >     Uli > > > > On 12/27/2017 09:59 AM, Dr. Johannes-Ulrich Menzebach via samba wrote: > > We have 3 ADCs based on Samba-4.7.4 (compiled from source,internal > > DNS)/ CentOS7: dcdo1,dcnh1 and dcge1. dcge1 holds all FSMO roles. > > The 3 ADCs are on different locations connected via IPSec based > > VPN. No traffic is filtered out. > > > > All 3 ADCs replicate fine except dcdo1 -->dcnh1. Symptom: > > > > [root at dcdo1 ~]# samba-tool drs replicate dcnh1.ad...

...the Sites and > Services console to each of them). > - I also checked that "samba-tool dbcheck" completes w/o showing > errors. > - the objectGUID DNS aliases of all DCs are resolvable against all 3 > DCs' builtin DNS > - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 other > DCs > which finished w/o errors. > - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed exactly > as > earlier. > > I'm wondering whether this is related to > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972 , however I'm > running...

...exists on all 3 DCs (pointing the Sites and Services console to each of them). - I also checked that "samba-tool dbcheck" completes w/o showing errors. - the objectGUID DNS aliases of all DCs are resolvable against all 3 DCs' builtin DNS - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 other DCs which finished w/o errors. - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed exactly as earlier. I'm wondering whether this is related to https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972 , however I'm running 4.7.4 and the domain had been created under 4...

...; > - I also checked that "samba-tool dbcheck" completes w/o showing > > > errors. > > > - the objectGUID DNS aliases of all DCs are resolvable against > > > all 3 > > > DCs' builtin DNS > > > - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 > > > other > > > DCs > > > which finished w/o errors. > > > - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed > > > exactly > > > as > > > earlier. > > > > > > I'm wondering whether this is...

...; Services console to each of them). >> - I also checked that "samba-tool dbcheck" completes w/o showing >> errors. >> - the objectGUID DNS aliases of all DCs are resolvable against all 3 >> DCs' builtin DNS >> - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 other >> DCs >> which finished w/o errors. >> - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed exactly >> as >> earlier. >> >> I'm wondering whether this is related to >> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972 , ho...

...ck" completes w/o >>>>> showing >>>>> errors. >>>>> - the objectGUID DNS aliases of all DCs are resolvable against >>>>> all 3 >>>>> DCs' builtin DNS >>>>> - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 >>>>> other >>>>> DCs >>>>> which finished w/o errors. >>>>> - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed >>>>> exactly >>>>> as >>>>> earlier. >>>>> &g...

We have 3 ADCs based on Samba-4.7.4 (compiled from source,internal DNS)/ CentOS7: dcdo1,dcnh1 and dcge1. dcge1 holds all FSMO roles. The 3 ADCs are on different locations connected via IPSec based VPN. No traffic is filtered out. All 3 ADCs replicate fine except dcdo1 -->dcnh1. Symptom: [root at dcdo1 ~]# samba-tool drs replicate dcnh1.ad.kdu.com dcdo1.ad.kdu.com dc=ad,dc=kdu,dc=com ERROR(&lt...

...dbcheck" completes w/o > > > > showing > > > > errors. > > > > - the objectGUID DNS aliases of all DCs are resolvable against > > > > all 3 > > > > DCs' builtin DNS > > > > - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 > > > > other > > > > DCs > > > > which finished w/o errors. > > > > - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed > > > > exactly > > > > as > > > > earlier. > > > > > >...

...dbcheck" completes w/o > > > > showing > > > > errors. > > > > - the objectGUID DNS aliases of all DCs are resolvable against > > > > all 3 > > > > DCs' builtin DNS > > > > - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 > > > > other > > > > DCs > > > > which finished w/o errors. > > > > - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed > > > > exactly > > > > as > > > > earlier. > > > > > >...

...gt;>>>>> showing >>>>>> errors. >>>>>> - the objectGUID DNS aliases of all DCs are resolvable against >>>>>> all 3 >>>>>> DCs' builtin DNS >>>>>> - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 >>>>>> other >>>>>> DCs >>>>>> which finished w/o errors. >>>>>> - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed >>>>>> exactly >>>>>> as >>>>>> earl...

...efault-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=kdu,DC=com seems to exist. Any ideas? Thanks,     Uli On 12/27/2017 09:59 AM, Dr. Johannes-Ulrich Menzebach via samba wrote: > We have 3 ADCs based on Samba-4.7.4 (compiled from source,internal > DNS)/ CentOS7: dcdo1,dcnh1 and dcge1. dcge1 holds all FSMO roles. The > 3 ADCs are on different locations connected via IPSec based VPN. No > traffic is filtered out. > > All 3 ADCs replicate fine except dcdo1 -->dcnh1. Symptom: > > [root at dcdo1 ~]# samba-tool drs replicate dcnh1.ad.kdu.com > dcdo1.ad.kdu....

...- I also checked that "samba-tool dbcheck" completes w/o showing > > > > errors. > > > > - the objectGUID DNS aliases of all DCs are resolvable against > > > > all 3 DCs' builtin DNS > > > > - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 > > > > other DCs which finished w/o errors. > > > > - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed > > > > exactly as earlier. > > > > > > > > I'm wondering whether this is related to > > > > ht...