search for: dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer

...lid zone operation IsSigneddnsserver: Invalid zone operation IsSigneddnsserver: Invalid zone operation IsSigneddnsserver: Invalid zone operation IsSigned../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:227: ERROR: pad length mismatch. Calculated 44 got 0 [2017/11/09 12:11:58.968226, 1] ../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:227(dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer) ../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:227: ERROR: pad length mismatch. Calculated 44 got 0 [2017/11/09 12:28:13.768393, 0] ../source4/rpc_server/dnsserver/dcerpc_dnsserver.c:1085(dnsserver_query_zone) dnsserver: Invalid zone operation IsSigneddnsserver: Invalid zone operation IsSigned../librpc/rpc/dce...

...eddnsserver: Invalid zone operation > IsSigneddnsserver: Invalid zone operation IsSigneddnsserver: Invalid > zone operation IsSigned../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:227: ERROR: pad > length mismatch. Calculated 44 got 0 > [2017/11/09 12:11:58.968226, 1] > ../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:227(dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer) > ../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:227: ERROR: pad length mismatch. > Calculated 44 got 0 > [2017/11/09 12:28:13.768393, 0] > ../source4/rpc_server/dnsserver/dcerpc_dnsserver.c:1085(dnsserver_query_zone) > dnsserver: Invalid zone operation IsSigneddnsserver: Invalid zone > operat...

...sSigneddnsserver: Invalid zone operation > IsSigneddnsserver: Invalid > >> zone operation IsSigned../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:227: ERROR: pad > >> length mismatch. Calculated 44 got 0 > >> [2017/11/09 12:11:58.968226, 1] > >> ../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:227(dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer) > >> ../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:227: ERROR: pad length mismatch. > >> Calculated 44 got 0 > >> [2017/11/09 12:28:13.768393, 0] > >> > ../source4/rpc_server/dnsserver/dcerpc_dnsserver.c:1085(dnsser > ver_query_zone) > >> dnsserver: Invalid z...

Hi, I found the following error message in the log.samba: [2020/04/20 16:32:33.168921, 1] ../../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:373(dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer) ../../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:373: ERROR: pad length mismatch. Calculated 44 got 0 It happens on all nodes on different times, but unfortunately I have no specific situation or action which causes this. We are currently using Samba version 4.12.1-SerNet-Debian-5.buster. Do you have any idea wh...

...?????? ppDataOut??????????????? : *// //??????????????? ppDataOut??????????????? : union DNSSRV_RPC_UNION(case 0)// //??????????????? Null???????????????????? : NULL// //??????????? result?????????????????? : WERR_DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE// //Sealed 16 bytes, and got 76 bytes header/signature.// //dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer: auth_pad_length 0// //Unsealed 112 bytes, with 76 bytes header/signature.// //???? DnssrvComplexOperation2: struct DnssrvComplexOperation2// //??????? in: struct DnssrvComplexOperation2// //??????????? dwClientVersion????????? : DNS_CLIENT_VERSION_LONGHORN (458752)// //??????????? dwSettingFlags?...

Hi, i got many errors like [2020/10/05 10:18:45.257966, 1] ../../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:373(dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer) ../../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:373: ERROR: pad length mismatch. Calculated 44 got 0 what it may be? Thanks

+1 "penny" :-) :-) for my thoughts.. :-p But yes, that should fix it. I also suggest, review your logs, you wil notice more messages. Rsyslog/apt/snmp/postfix/ntp need manual changes after the upgrade. At least these, maybe more but these are the one i've encountered. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at

...Out : union >> DNSSRV_RPC_UNION(case >> 0)// >> // Null : NULL// >> // result : >> WERR_DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE// >> //Sealed 16 bytes, and got 76 bytes header/signature.// >> //dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer: auth_pad_length 0// >> //Unsealed 112 bytes, with 76 bytes header/signature.// >> // DnssrvComplexOperation2: struct DnssrvComplexOperation2// >> // in: struct DnssrvComplexOperation2// >> // dwClientVersion : DNS_CLIENT_VERSION_LONGHORN >&...

...NION(case >>>> 0)// >>>> // Null : NULL// >>>> // result : >>>> WERR_DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE// >>>> //Sealed 16 bytes, and got 76 bytes header/signature.// >>>> //dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer: auth_pad_length 0// >>>> //Unsealed 112 bytes, with 76 bytes header/signature.// >>>> // DnssrvComplexOperation2: struct DnssrvComplexOperation2// >>>> // in: struct DnssrvComplexOperation2// >>>> // dwClientVersion : D...

...67] > gensec_update_done: spnego[0x20a1450]: > NT_STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED > tevent_req[0x208fe80/../../auth/gensec/spnego.c:1631]: > state[2] error[0 > (0x0)] state[struct gensec_spnego_update_state (0x2090030)] > timer[(nil)] finish[../../auth/gensec/spnego.c:2115] > dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer: auth_pad_length 0 > gensec_gssapi: NO credentials were delegated > GSSAPI Connection will be cryptographically signed > gensec_update_send: gssapi_krb5[0x20a1840]: subreq: 0x20a2550 > gensec_update_send: spnego[0x20a1450]: subreq: 0x2094480 > gensec_update_done: gssapi_krb5[0x20a184...

...t; > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > > Onderwerp: [Samba] pad length mismatch error message > > > > Hi, > > > > I found the following error message in the log.samba: > > > > [2020/04/20 16:32:33.168921, 1] > > ../../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:373(dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer) > > ../../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:373: ERROR: pad length > > mismatch. Calculated 44 got 0 > > > > It happens on all nodes on different times, but unfortunately > > I have no specific situation or action which causes this. > > > > We are currently usi...

Hai Christian, > Can someone reproduce this? No, tried, but sorry, works fine for me on my 4.11.6 server. And what is you try it like this. samba-tool dns add dc1.zone1.domain.de 0.168.192.in-addr.arpa 157 PTR zone1.domain.de -U Administrator samba-tool dns add dc1.zone1.domain.de 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa 157 PTR zone2.domain.de -U Administrator I tested on my production where i have 6

...t; // ppDataOut : union > DNSSRV_RPC_UNION(case > 0)// > // Null : NULL// > // result : > WERR_DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE// > //Sealed 16 bytes, and got 76 bytes header/signature.// > //dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer: auth_pad_length 0// > //Unsealed 112 bytes, with 76 bytes header/signature.// > // DnssrvComplexOperation2: struct DnssrvComplexOperation2// > // in: struct DnssrvComplexOperation2// > // dwClientVersion : DNS_CLIENT_VERSION_LONGHORN > (458752)// >...

...t; Verzonden: woensdag 22 april 2020 14:18 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] pad length mismatch error message > > Hi, > > I found the following error message in the log.samba: > > [2020/04/20 16:32:33.168921, 1] > ../../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:373(dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer) > ../../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:373: ERROR: pad length > mismatch. Calculated 44 got 0 > > It happens on all nodes on different times, but unfortunately > I have no specific situation or action which causes this. > > We are currently using Samba version 4.12.1-SerNet-Debi...

...t; > > Onderwerp: [Samba] pad length mismatch error message > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I found the following error message in the log.samba: > > > > > > [2020/04/20 16:32:33.168921, 1] > > > ../../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:373(dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer) > > > ../../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:373: ERROR: pad length > > > mismatch. Calculated 44 got 0 > > > > > > It happens on all nodes on different times, but unfortunately > > > I have no specific situation or action which causes this. Thanks for repo...

...DNSSRV_RPC_UNION(case > > > 0)// > > > // Null : NULL// > > > // result : > > > WERR_DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE// > > > //Sealed 16 bytes, and got 76 bytes header/signature.// > > > //dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer: auth_pad_length 0// > > > //Unsealed 112 bytes, with 76 bytes header/signature.// > > > // DnssrvComplexOperation2: struct DnssrvComplexOperation2// > > > // in: struct DnssrvComplexOperation2// > > > // dwClientVersion : DNS_CLIEN...

I've read the documentation that domain trusts should be fully supported with both Kerberos and NTLM authentication. I've created a new 2016 domain on a Windows box and created a Samba domain on a Linux box with a BIND9_DLZ backend. Both servers can resolve both DNS domains forwards and backwards and I am able to connect a Windows 10 client to the Samba domain without any issues. The

...YjczYTNiYjZjNmQuX21zZGNzLmxvamFjb3JyLmxvY2FsAA== - [2016/08/19 15:13:27.694897, 2] ../source4/dsdb/repl/replicated_objects.c:1008(dsdb_replicated_objects_commit) Replicated 1 objects (0 linked attributes) for DC=domain,DC=local [2016/08/19 15:13:27.816480, 6] ../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:173(dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer) ../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:173: auth_pad_length 12 [2016/08/19 15:13:27.816608, 4] ../source4/dsdb/repl/drepl_out_helpers.c:918(dreplsrv_update_refs_done) UpdateRefs OK for f192ce0f-92cf-4511-b1bb-71b0fbc2f39c._msdcs.domain.local DC=domain,DC=local [2016/08/19 15:13:27.816632, 4] ../source4...

...; > > > // Null : NULL// > > > > > // result : > > > > > WERR_DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE// > > > > > //Sealed 16 bytes, and got 76 bytes header/signature.// > > > > > //dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer: auth_pad_length 0// > > > > > //Unsealed 112 bytes, with 76 bytes header/signature.// > > > > > // DnssrvComplexOperation2: struct DnssrvComplexOperation2// > > > > > // in: struct DnssrvComplexOperation2// > > > > > //...

...LmxvY2FsAA== > - > > > [2016/08/19 15:13:27.694897, 2] ../source4/dsdb/repl/ > replicated_objects.c:1008(dsdb_replicated_objects_commit) > Replicated 1 objects (0 linked attributes) for DC=domain,DC=local > [2016/08/19 15:13:27.816480, 6] ../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c: > 173(dcerpc_pull_auth_trailer) > ../librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:173: auth_pad_length 12 > [2016/08/19 15:13:27.816608, 4] ../source4/dsdb/repl/drepl_ > out_helpers.c:918(dreplsrv_update_refs_done) > UpdateRefs OK for f192ce0f-92cf-4511-b1bb-71b0fbc2f39c._msdcs.domain.local > DC=domain,DC=local > [2016/08/19 15:1...