Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "dce94f".
Did you mean:
d94f
2014 Mar 23
2
Re: [PATCH] Fix building on architectures where ocamlopt is not available
...chard W.M. Jones:
> (1) Removing .NOTPARALLEL. This fails, as expected.
>
> (2) mlguestfs.cmxa: mlguestfs.cma -- fails
>
> (3) mlguestfs.cmxa: | mlguestfs.cma -- fails after a longer time
I find it strange that (2) and (3) fail.
> (4) The attached patch which is derived from dce94f -- this ran
> without failing for 120 iterations (and still going).
The patch looks good to me.
-Hilko
2014 Mar 22
3
Re: [PATCH] Fix building on architectures where ocamlopt is not available
* Richard W.M. Jones:
>> Wouldn't a rule without commands such as
>>
>> mlguestfs.cmxa: mlguestfs.cma
>>
>> also prevent make from building the two targets in parallel?
>
> Doesn't that mean that if mlguestfs.cmxa is out of date, simply
> running the mlguestfs.cma rule will build it (which it won't)?
Not sure if I understand you.
If I cause