search for: dcdo1

We have 3 ADCs based on Samba-4.7.4 (compiled from source,internal DNS)/ CentOS7: dcdo1,dcnh1 and dcge1. dcge1 holds all FSMO roles. The 3 ADCs are on different locations connected via IPSec based VPN. No traffic is filtered out. All 3 ADCs replicate fine except dcdo1 -->dcnh1. Symptom: [root at dcdo1 ~]# samba-tool drs replicate dcnh1.ad.kdu.com dcdo1.ad.kdu.com dc=ad,dc=kdu,...

On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 13:00:05 +0100 "Dr. Johannes-Ulrich Menzebach via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > There is additional info in the logs of the source DC (dcdo1, log > level 2, manually triggered another replication): > ==================== > [2017/12/27 12:31:29.695121,  2] > ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/getncchanges.c:1731(getncchanges_collect_objects) >   ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/getncchanges.c:1731: getncchanges on > DC=ad,DC...

..." completes w/o showing > errors. > - the objectGUID DNS aliases of all DCs are resolvable against all 3 > DCs' builtin DNS > - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 other > DCs > which finished w/o errors. > - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed exactly > as > earlier. > > I'm wondering whether this is related to > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972 , however I'm > running > 4.7.4 and the domain had been created under 4.7.3 (based on the > Samba > Wiki). Apart from the...

...ecked that "samba-tool dbcheck" completes w/o showing errors. - the objectGUID DNS aliases of all DCs are resolvable against all 3 DCs' builtin DNS - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 other DCs which finished w/o errors. - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed exactly as earlier. I'm wondering whether this is related to https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972 , however I'm running 4.7.4 and the domain had been created under 4.7.3 (based on the Samba Wiki). Apart from the sync issue I'm VERY happy with Samba4/AD...

There is additional info in the logs of the source DC (dcdo1, log level 2, manually triggered another replication): ==================== [2017/12/27 12:31:29.695121,  2] ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/getncchanges.c:1731(getncchanges_collect_objects)   ../source4/rpc_server/drsuapi/getncchanges.c:1731: getncchanges on DC=ad,DC=kdu,DC=com using filter (uSN...

...all DCs are resolvable against > > > all 3 > > > DCs' builtin DNS > > > - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 > > > other > > > DCs > > > which finished w/o errors. > > > - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed > > > exactly > > > as > > > earlier. > > > > > > I'm wondering whether this is related to > > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972 , however I'm > > > running > > > 4.7.4 and the domain...

...ng >> errors. >> - the objectGUID DNS aliases of all DCs are resolvable against all 3 >> DCs' builtin DNS >> - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 other >> DCs >> which finished w/o errors. >> - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed exactly >> as >> earlier. >> >> I'm wondering whether this is related to >> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972 , however I'm >> running >> 4.7.4 and the domain had been created under 4.7.3 (based on the >> Samba...

...t;>> all 3 >>>>> DCs' builtin DNS >>>>> - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 >>>>> other >>>>> DCs >>>>> which finished w/o errors. >>>>> - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed >>>>> exactly >>>>> as >>>>> earlier. >>>>> >>>>> I'm wondering whether this is related to >>>>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972 , however I'm >>>>> ru...

...; > > > all 3 > > > > DCs' builtin DNS > > > > - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 > > > > other > > > > DCs > > > > which finished w/o errors. > > > > - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed > > > > exactly > > > > as > > > > earlier. > > > > > > > > I'm wondering whether this is related to > > > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972 , however I'm > > > > running...

...; > > > all 3 > > > > DCs' builtin DNS > > > > - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 > > > > other > > > > DCs > > > > which finished w/o errors. > > > > - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed > > > > exactly > > > > as > > > > earlier. > > > > > > > > I'm wondering whether this is related to > > > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972 , however I'm > > > > running...

...;>>>> DCs' builtin DNS >>>>>> - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 >>>>>> other >>>>>> DCs >>>>>> which finished w/o errors. >>>>>> - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed >>>>>> exactly >>>>>> as >>>>>> earlier. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm wondering whether this is related to >>>>>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972 , however I'm...

...jectGUID DNS aliases of all DCs are resolvable against > > > > all 3 DCs' builtin DNS > > > > - I forced a full sync from the FSMO holder (dcge1) to the 2 > > > > other DCs which finished w/o errors. > > > > - after that, sync and also full sync dcdo1-->dcnh1 failed > > > > exactly as earlier. > > > > > > > > I'm wondering whether this is related to > > > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972 , however I'm > > > > running > > > > 4.7.4 and the doma...