Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "dc_ad".
Did you mean:
dc1ad
2016 Jun 13
2
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
Rowland:
I'll use this email from now, the other does not work well.
A few years ago around 2.
We did everything that could be used for NIX and it worked.
The main DC_AD had been provisioned without rfc2307 and we did later.
The problem is that at that time by not having infrastructure had to be
used as fileserver and this was a problem because all directories are UID
of 3000000 onwards.
Now I installed a new server following the procedure here:
https://wiki.sam...
2016 Jun 13
2
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
...nd penny wrote:
> On 13/06/16 19:37, Juan Ignacio wrote:
>> Rowland:
>>
>> I'll use this email from now, the other does not work well.
>>
>> A few years ago around 2.
>>
>> We did everything that could be used for NIX and it worked.
>> The main DC_AD had been provisioned without rfc2307 and we did later.
>>
>> The problem is that at that time by not having infrastructure had to
>> be used as fileserver and this was a problem because all directories
>> are UID of 3000000 onwards.
>>
>> Now I installed a new...
2016 Jun 14
2
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
...19:37, Juan Ignacio wrote:
>
> Rowland:
>
> I'll use this email from now, the other does not work well.
>
> A few years ago around 2.
>
> We did everything that could be used for NIX and it worked.
> The main DC_AD had been provisioned without rfc2307 and we
> did later.
>
> The problem is that at that time by not having
> infrastructure had to be used as fileserver and this was a
> problem because all directories are UID of 3000000 onwards.
>...
2016 Jun 13
0
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
On 13/06/16 19:37, Juan Ignacio wrote:
> Rowland:
>
> I'll use this email from now, the other does not work well.
>
> A few years ago around 2.
>
> We did everything that could be used for NIX and it worked.
> The main DC_AD had been provisioned without rfc2307 and we did later.
>
> The problem is that at that time by not having infrastructure had to
> be used as fileserver and this was a problem because all directories
> are UID of 3000000 onwards.
>
> Now I installed a new server following the pro...
2016 Jun 14
0
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
...uan Ignacio wrote:
>>
>>> Rowland:
>>>
>>> I'll use this email from now, the other does not work well.
>>>
>>> A few years ago around 2.
>>>
>>> We did everything that could be used for NIX and it worked.
>>> The main DC_AD had been provisioned without rfc2307 and we did later.
>>>
>>> The problem is that at that time by not having infrastructure had to be
>>> used as fileserver and this was a problem because all directories are UID
>>> of 3000000 onwards.
>>>
>>>...
2016 Jun 14
2
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
...>
> I'll use this email from now, the other does not
> work well.
>
> A few years ago around 2.
>
> We did everything that could be used for NIX and
> it worked.
> The main DC_AD had been provisioned without
> rfc2307 and we
> did later.
>
> The problem is that at that time by not having
> infrastructure had to be used as fileserver and
> this was a
> problem...
2016 Jun 14
0
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
...>> Rowland:
>>
>> I'll use this email from now, the other does not work well.
>>
>> A few years ago around 2.
>>
>> We did everything that could be used for NIX and it worked.
>> The main DC_AD had been provisioned without rfc2307 and we
>> did later.
>>
>> The problem is that at that time by not having
>> infrastructure had to be used as fileserver and this was a
>> problem because all directories are UID of 30...
2016 Jun 14
0
Samba4 Domain Member Server "Getent show diferents UID"
...I'll use this email from now, the other does not
>> work well.
>>
>> A few years ago around 2.
>>
>> We did everything that could be used for NIX and
>> it worked.
>> The main DC_AD had been provisioned without
>> rfc2307 and we
>> did later.
>>
>> The problem is that at that time by not having
>> infrastructure had to be used as fileserver and
>> this was a
>>...