search for: dc5

...lf ago I upgraded from 4.0.12 to 4.9.6. Overall, things are functioning. However, I have come across several strange behaviors and wandered if anyone else has noticed similar behavior on 4.9.6 or has any suggestions of what might be occurring. As background information, I have 3 DCs (dc3, dc4 and dc5) -- all running the same version (4.9.6) and all have the same configuration; dc3 was the original holder of all 7 FSMO roles, but as of last night, they were all transferred to dc4. First off, all the DCs hold steady at different levels of memory utilized. dc3 hovers at about 1.5 GB used, dc4 ho...

Hi list, We use samba 4.1.17 (debian's version) on several DCs. I just realized that one of them is desynced and cannot get it to resync. The long story: we got 5 DCs splitted over several sites. Recently we had to replace one of them (let's call him DC5). Since both had to run in parallel for data recovery/users work we decided to join a brand new DC (DC6) and latter demote the second one (DC5). Where things get even more complicated is that once DC5 has been removed we put DC6 on its IP (following wiki). We performed some cleanup in the DNS a...

...t; >> We use samba 4.1.17 (debian's version) on several DCs. I just >> realized that one of them is desynced and cannot get it to resync. >> >> The long story: we got 5 DCs splitted over several sites. Recently we >> had to replace one of them (let's call him DC5). Since both had to >> run in parallel for data recovery/users work we decided to join a >> brand new DC (DC6) and latter demote the second one (DC5). Where >> things get even more complicated is that once DC5 has been removed we >> put DC6 on its IP (following wiki). We...

...9.6. Overall, > things are functioning. > > However, I have come across several strange behaviors and wandered if > anyone else has noticed similar behavior on 4.9.6 or has any > suggestions of what might be occurring. > > As background information, I have 3 DCs (dc3, dc4 and dc5) -- all > running the same version (4.9.6) and all have the same configuration; > dc3 was the original holder of all 7 FSMO roles, but as of last > night, they were all transferred to dc4. > > > First off, all the DCs hold steady at different levels of memory > utilized. dc3...

...3 times a week) the DCs lockup, get stuck Having said that, I think I found a way out, but would appreciate some feedback from the experts here. In an isolated test setup, I started a clone of DC2/DC3/DC4, verified that replication is working correctly, ldapcmp as well, etc. Then I added a new DC5. DC2 (fsmo roles owner) did not pick it up at all, DC3 picked it up with WERR_DS_DRA_ACCESS_DENIED, and only DC4 picked it up nicely. So, rolled back, shutdown DC2, and seized fsmo roles on DC4, and added a new samba 4.7 DC5. DC4 picked it up nicely again. DC3 still WERR_DS_DRA_ACCESS_DENIED, s...

Hi, We did a classicupgrade of our Ubuntu Server (4.3.11, TDB), the server DC5 also host shares. Post the migration we are seeing some permission issues. When trying to give permission to a domain group/user to folder/file we get the following chown "LIN\\myadmin:LIN\\adgroup" adtest/ chown: invalid user: 'LIN\\myadmin:LIN\\adgroup' wbinfo --ping-dc : che...

...seen issues since offsetting the CRONs (offsetting the run times fixed an intermittent error with the KCC command). However, this morning, I find that the LDAPCMP command is failing on all 3 DCs. The error is the same on all DCs and the same for domain, configuration, etc: # samba-tool ldapcmp dc5 DC3 DNSFOREST ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - LDAP error 32 LDAP_NO_SUCH_OBJECT - <dsdb_access: Access check failed on CN=Configuration,DC=domain,DC=local> <> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 177, in _run return self.run(*args, **k...

...3 times a week) the DCs lockup, get stuck Having said that, I think I found a way out, but would appreciate some feedback from the experts here. In an isolated test setup, I started a clone of DC2/DC3/DC4, verified that replication is working correctly, ldapcmp as well, etc. Then I added a new DC5. DC2 (fsmo roles owner) did not pick it up at all, DC3 picked it up with WERR_DS_DRA_ACCESS_DENIED, and only DC4 picked it up nicely. So, rolled back, shutdown DC2, and seized fsmo roles on DC4, and added a new samba 4.7 DC5. DC4 picked it up nicely again. DC3 still WERR_DS_DRA_ACCESS_DENIED, s...

...s are functioning. >> >> However, I have come across several strange behaviors and wandered if >> anyone else has noticed similar behavior on 4.9.6 or has any >> suggestions of what might be occurring. >> >> As background information, I have 3 DCs (dc3, dc4 and dc5) -- all >> running the same version (4.9.6) and all have the same configuration; >> dc3 was the original holder of all 7 FSMO roles, but as of last >> night, they were all transferred to dc4. >> >> >> First off, all the DCs hold steady at different levels of me...

...t; DC2 => well replicated from DC1 > DC3 => well replicated from DC1 > > Remote_Site_1 > DC4 => tries to replicate from DC2, but fails with WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND > error > (even manually with samba-tool drs replicate DC4 DC1 DC=mydomain,DC=lan) > > Remote_Site_2 > DC5 => well replicated from DC1 > > Remote_Site_3 > DC6 => well replicated from DC1, but sometimes fails trying to > replicate from DC3... > > > > I tried demoted DC4 several times and rejoined it, whithout success. > Each time it fails with ths machine (i checked netw...

Hello everybody, I've bin running Samba as a AD member server for ages (Debian stable). After the last update to 4.2, I just can't get it to work. Symptoms: unable to map AD user / groups. After two days of successlessly fiddling (and moving all data to another server with still Samba 3.6, which I will definitely NOT update at the moment), I decided to purge my Installation and start

...h the > SOA record. > > If I ask each DC in my domain (I have two) for the SOA, I get this: > > root at dc4:~# host -t soa samdom.example.com > samdom.example.com has SOA record dc4.samdom.example.com. > hostmaster.samdom.example.com. 8283 900 600 86400 3600 > > root at dc5:~# host -t soa samdom.example.com > samdom.example.com has SOA record dc5.samdom.example.com. > hostmaster.samdom.example.com. 8283 900 600 86400 3600 > > As you can see, each claims to be the master. > > Rowland > Correct, I have the same behavior on each DC. But In ADUC con...

On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:40:15 +0700 fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > Thanks for your response ? > > If I succesfully upgrade DC4 (the karoshi samba package) to samba > 4.20, is there any posibilities that i can join the new samba machine > (DC6) to the DC4 ? Possibly, try it. > If I rebuild new machine, what data will be lost

----- On May 22, 2019, at 10:01 AM, samba samba at lists.samba.org wrote: > Try again with : > > samba-tool ldapcmp dc5.$(hostname -d) dc3.$(hostname -d) DNSFOREST > As in dc5.your.dns.domain.tld ... > > Whats the result.? The failure is still present -- no change in the output of the command: # samba-tool ldapcmp dc3.domain.local dc5.domain.local DNSFOREST ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - LDAP error 32...

....15 (default of ubuntu 20) and the other backup file after the upgraded on samba 4.19.5+karoshi When I try to restore the old backup file (the one before i did the upgraded), i found the same error with my new samba that can't join my existing AD. I already try to restore the old backup file in DC5 ubuntu 20 with samba 4.19.5+karoshi-1~linuxschools1+focal1 and in DC6 ubuntu 24 with samba 4.19.5 and in DC7 debian 12 with samba 4.20.2 it at dc5:~$ sudo samba-tool domain backup restore --backup-file=/home/it/samba-backup-2023-02-18T09-28-56.646109.tar.bz2 --targetdir=/var/lib/samba --newservern...

Try again with : samba-tool ldapcmp dc5.$(hostname -d) dc3.$(hostname -d) DNSFOREST As in dc5.your.dns.domain.tld ... Whats the result.? If it fails, please tell os your: OS? Content of /etc/hosts /etc/resolv.conf /etc/nsswitch.conf /etc/samba/smb.conf > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces...

...1 >> DC3 => well replicated from DC1 >> >> Remote_Site_1 >> DC4 => tries to replicate from DC2, but fails with >> WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND error >> (even manually with samba-tool drs replicate DC4 DC1 DC=mydomain,DC=lan) >> >> Remote_Site_2 >> DC5 => well replicated from DC1 >> >> Remote_Site_3 >> DC6 => well replicated from DC1, but sometimes fails trying to >> replicate from DC3... >> >> >> >> I tried demoted DC4 several times and rejoined it, whithout success. >> Each time it fa...

....10.1 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2019 binary_smbd_main: samba PID 6465 was called with maxruntime 18000 - current ts 1554585629 binary_smbd_main: samba: using 'standard' process model Attempting to autogenerate TLS self-signed keys for https for hostname 'DC5.samba2000.example.com' /home/user/src/samba-git/samba/bin/winbindd: Failed to create /usr/local/samba/var/cores/winbindd for user 0 with mode 0700 /home/user/src/samba-git/samba/bin/winbindd: Unable to setup corepath for winbindd: Permission denied /home/user/src/samba-git/samba/bin/winbindd: F...

Hi I have a setup with 2 DC on a main site, et 14 DCs which are located on 7 AD sites. I recently noticed in my DNS zones that my SOA record is associated to the last DC that was joined to the domain. But this DC is located on one of the remote sites. Is this behavior normal or would it be better if I updated this record via "samba-tool dns update" to point it to one of my 3 main

...users = yes winbind enum groups = yes krb5.conf [libdefaults] default_realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL clockskew = 300 [realms] DOMAIN.LOCAL = { admin_server = tcp/DC2.domain.local:749 kdc = tcp/DC2.domain.local:88 admin_server = tcp/DC5.domain.local:749 kdc = tcp/DC5.domain.local:88 default_domain = domain.local } [domain_realm] .domain.local = DOMAIN.LOCAL domain.local = DOMAIN.LOCAL AD Event Logs: Event Type: Error Event Source: NETLOGON Event Category: None...