search for: dc415f18

Totally fair call, sorry it took me a while to come back around to this - added in r324702 On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:47 PM Rafael Avila de Espindola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:44 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> > > wrote: > > >

...We use cd/rm/cp in LLD testcases without requiring shell. (also noticed other tests do that, so it seems consistent, though did not look deeply) George. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180209/dc415f18/attachment-0001.html>

David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:44 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> > wrote: > >> There's no requirement that DW_AT_ranges (or high/low_pc) appear on the >> skeleton CU rather than the DWO CU. So it's quite possible that to get the >> address ranges covered by the CU one would