search for: dc4

...th reverse dns records. These zones were probably added using RSAT DNS tool in the past. If I did something wrong during join & demote, it would be nice to know if I have any option except deleting/re-adding all subdomain dns records in order to make dns service work again. Jul 24 08:19:21 dc4 named[1526]: loading configuration from '/etc/bind /named.conf' Jul 24 08:19:21 dc4 named[1526]: reading built-in trusted keys from file '/etc/bind/bind.keys' Jul 24 08:19:21 dc4 named[1526]: using default UDP/IPv4 port range: [32768, 60999] Jul 24 08:19:21 dc4 named[1526]: using...

Well, I have finally installed Samba 4.9 from Van Belle's repo, but still I cannot resolve FQDN's. Dňa 22. 1. 2019 o 15:02 Rowland Penny via samba napísal(a): > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:51:02 +0100 > "Mgr. Peter Tuharsky via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Rowland, thank You, but this removes only the NS record, but the >> faulty domain A

...se zones were > probably added using RSAT DNS tool in the past. If I did something > wrong during join & demote, it would be nice to know if I have any > option except deleting/re-adding all subdomain dns records in order > to make dns service work again. > > Jul 24 08:19:21 dc4 named[1526]: loading configuration from > '/etc/bind /named.conf' > Jul 24 08:19:21 dc4 named[1526]: reading built-in trusted keys from > file '/etc/bind/bind.keys' > Jul 24 08:19:21 dc4 named[1526]: using default UDP/IPv4 port range: > [32768, 60999] > Jul 24 08:...

On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 18:56 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >  > That shouldn't make any difference, the 2003 level only used the > three > enctypes you have now, this is on one of my DC's: > >  root at dc4:~# samba-tool domain level show > Domain and forest function level for domain > 'DC=samdom,DC=example,DC=com' > > Forest function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 > Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 > Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2 > root at dc4:~# kli...

Hi, I have three Samba Domain Controllers, two in the LAN local network (dc1 and dc2) and one in a remote network which is accessible from the LAN through a VPN connection (dc4). Every domain controller can reach every other domain controllers, and every type of traffic is permitted by firewalls, they can ping and access to every TCP and UDP ports. Checking the Samba replication I see that the two domain controllers on the local network (dc1 and dc2) are regularly replic...

...h their old dns/ip - removed the temp dc again - synced sysvol and all is looking well: no db errors, no replication issues, ldapcmp matches across DCs, etc. So, I took things to production today, and now I see two things that I would like some feedback on: Bind complains: > Nov 07 18:20:28 dc4 named[19990]: samba_dlz: disallowing update of signer=p002507\$\@SAMBA.DOMAIN.COM name=P002507.samba.domain.com type=AAAA error=insufficient access rights > Nov 07 18:20:28 dc4 named[19990]: client 192.168.10.12#57335/key p002507\$\@SAMBA.DOMAIN.COM: updating zone 'samba.domain.com/NONE'...

...vate/sysvol/ >> Seems to be an issue with rsync causing trouble with sysvols. >> >> achim~ > > I just tried your suggestion, rsync over ssh vs rsync to rsyncd, and > much to my surprise, there is a difference in the resulting data?! > > However unfortunately on our DC4, also rsync over ssh doesn't give us > the same getfacl output as on DC2/DC3, but it's surprising (to me) > that there is a difference at all: > > rsync to rsyncd result on DC4: >> root at dc4:~/sysvol# getfacl /var/lib/samba/sysvol >> getfacl: Removing leading ...

a quick read and one thing, the dc4, after the upgrade to 4.7, did you reindex the ad database? if im correct, samba-tool dbcheck — reindex i did read that from a list somewere, a responce of andrew. greetz Louis (mobile) Op 23 okt. 2017 om 20:47 heeft mj via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: Hi,...

...ame, test conditions are different ... I don't know. It did work on prior incarnation of DC. Also the logs looked much more like those below, and the updates were being made. >> =================================== ERRORS > >It is supposed to look like this: > >Jan 10 19:36:41 dc4 dhcpd[2093]: Commit: IP: 192.168.0.55 DHCID: 1:b8:27:eb:d3:31:81 Name: devuan >Jan 10 19:36:41 dc4 dhcpd[2093]: execute_statement argv[0] = /usr/local/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh >Jan 10 19:36:41 dc4 dhcpd[2093]: execute_statement argv[1] = add >Jan 10 19:36:41 dc4 dhcpd[2093]: execute_statement ar...

...corruption: tombstones not being deleted from sam.lbd, ultimately resulting in a huge database, full root disk, samba crashing, we were completely down. We asked the great guys at sernet to help, they did super work, and managed to get us up and running again, including the addition of a fresh DC4. Currently on 4.5.15, we have some strange issues with our samba AD setup, that I feel are remains from these old problems. Specifically: - we cannot transfer fsmo roles between DCs due to LDAP error 50 infufficient access rights - have have high cpu usage acress the DCs, combined with continuou...

Greetings, I am in the process of replacing my MicroFocus (Novell) eDirectory system with a Samba-based Active Directory system. I've got three domain controllers built, and they seem to be humming along nicely. Server OS is Ubuntu 18.04 patched current. I started off with the Samba 4.7 packages included in the default Ubuntu repository, but have since upgraded to Samba 4.10 using packages

...s (to me) in the log (see below for the same time period as the latest rebalance failure). This is the only brick on that server that has disconnects like this. Steve [2017-10-17 02:22:13.453575] I [MSGID: 115029] [server-handshake.c:692:server_setvolume] 0-video-server: accepted client from node-dc4-03-5825-2017/08/30-20:45:55:170091-video-client-4-2-318 (version: 3.8.15) [2017-10-17 02:22:31.353286] I [MSGID: 115036] [server.c:548:server_rpc_notify] 0-video-server: disconnecting connection from node-dc4-02-29040-2017/08/04-09:31:22:842268-video-client-4-7-403 [2017-10-17 02:22:31.353326] I [M...

...failover from a Windows client: You can switch logon servers with "nltest /server:<clientcomputer> /sc_reset:<domain\dc>" https://www.technipages.com/windows-how-to-switch-domain-controller So try this -- (I just did this on one of my DC's): * Switch a Windows Client to DC4 * Verify with "nltest /dsgetdc:<domain>" and "nltest /sc_query:<domain>" C:\WINDOWS\system32>nltest /Server:<mycomputer> /sc_query:<shortdomainname> > Flags: 30 HAS_IP HAS_TIMESERV > Trusted DC Name \\<DC4>.<mydomain.com> > Trust...

Hello, I had posted this in another topic, but because the problem is different, I decided to create a new topic. Conf: - Primary DC/pdc Emulator as DC3 - Second DC as DC4 After an upgrade from schema 45 to 69 in DCs, when adding a computer in the domain and if the domain to respond is DC4 the synchronization for DC3 is not done. I already did several tests that I already knew and also new ones that I found in the wiki, but without success in finding the problem....

Am 29.04.2019 um 19:21 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:02:44 +0200 > Christian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >>>>> Thats a strange one.. >>>>> >>>>>> This is correct: 'dns-dc2' uses "msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes": >>>>>> 31 (0x0000001f)

...+0100 > Peter Tuharsky via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Well, I have finally installed Samba 4.9 from Van Belle's repo, but >> still I cannot resolve FQDN's. >> > It should work, here is proof: > > rowland at devstation:~/diff$ nslookup dc4 > Server: 192.168.0.6 > Address: 192.168.0.6#53 > > Name: dc4.samdom.example.com > Address: 192.168.0.6 > > rowland at devstation:~/diff$ nslookup dc4.samdom.example.com > Server: 192.168.0.6 > Address: 192.168.0.6#53 > > Name: dc4.samdom.example.com > Address:...

On 11/12/2019 18:10, shacky via samba wrote: > Hi, > I have three Samba Domain Controllers, two in the LAN local network (dc1 > and dc2) and one in a remote network which is accessible from the LAN > through a VPN connection (dc4). > Every domain controller can reach every other domain controllers, and every > type of traffic is permitted by firewalls, they can ping and access to > every TCP and UDP ports. > > Checking the Samba replication I see that the two domain controllers on the > local network (dc1...

Hi, After joining samba DC (vm-dc4) to MS AD, I've discovered that most DNS entries were not populated. Below are the only entries in the AD for the new DC: domain.com:VM-DC4 900 A 172.26.1.84 _msdcs.domain.com:d14c4206-79e3-441f-868a-6c693415256a 900 CNAME vm-dc4.domain.com. Please, help me figu...

...gain, there > should be corresponding "_gc" records (similar to "_ldap") for each DC. Checked and both DCs pass all tests:- host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.mydomain.com. host -t SRV _gc._tcp.mydomain.com. host -t SRV _kerberos._udp.mydomain.com. host -t A dc3.mydomain.com. host -t A dc4.mydomain.com. e.g. (for _gc) root at dc3.mydomain.com ~ $ (screen) host -t SRV _gc._tcp.mydomain.com. _gc._tcp.mydomain.com has SRV record 0 100 3268 dc3.mydomain.com. _gc._tcp.mydomain.com has SRV record 0 100 3268 dc4.mydomain.com. > So, based upon the link/graphic I posted earlier: > *...

...k and half ago I upgraded from 4.0.12 to 4.9.6. Overall, things are functioning. However, I have come across several strange behaviors and wandered if anyone else has noticed similar behavior on 4.9.6 or has any suggestions of what might be occurring. As background information, I have 3 DCs (dc3, dc4 and dc5) -- all running the same version (4.9.6) and all have the same configuration; dc3 was the original holder of all 7 FSMO roles, but as of last night, they were all transferred to dc4. First off, all the DCs hold steady at different levels of memory utilized. dc3 hovers at about 1.5 GB used...