search for: dc38d901

On Sep 28, 2007, at 11:36 AM, <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> wrote: > I moved my code to 2.1 but still the same. > If I make ADD i16 legal, then it goes through, but it has problem > expanding it to i8. > Should I go ahead and customize it and do the same for all > instructions? > Or there is a more general thing that I

I moved my code to 2.1 but still the same. If I make ADD i16 legal, then it goes through, but it has problem expanding it to i8. Should I go ahead and customize it and do the same for all instructions? Or there is a more general thing that I can do? A. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Lattner Sent:

...list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: stacktrace.txt URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070928/dc38d901/attachment.txt> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dag.ps Type: application/postscript Size: 23458 bytes Desc: dag.ps URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070928/dc38d901/attachment.ps>