search for: dc01

...u. > With the script dropped in straight off Wiki, the errors are now as > follow. NOTE: the script does, of course, provide at least an exit > code here. Also, nothing else was generated in samba-ad-dc or bind9 > logs during this operation: It only logs to syslog >Jan 10 14:31:46 dc01 dhcpd[1123]: Commit: > IP: 172.20.10.165 DHCID: 1:d4:be:d9:22:9f:7d Name: mgmt01 From here on the script should be run > Jan 10 14:31:46 dc01 sh[1123]: /usr/local/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh: line 10: > samba: command not found Ah, you are (if I remember correctly) using a self compiled Samba...

...n't in /usr/local and then try again. > Here it is with script properly configured. > Regarding the later lines having to do with the script, I clearly don't know what exactly is causing them. But surely they are all > somehow part of this update process? > > Jan 10 15:46:23 dc01 dhcpd[1208]: Commit: IP: 172.20.10.165 DHCID: 1:d4:be:d9:22:9f:7d Name: mgmt01 > Jan 10 15:46:23 dc01 dhcpd[1208]: execute_statement argv[0] = /usr/local/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh > Jan 10 15:46:23 dc01 dhcpd[1208]: execute_statement argv[1] = add > Jan 10 15:46:23 dc01 dhcpd[1208]: execute_state...

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Billy Bob <billysbobs at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:08 PM, Billy Bob via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >Do you want to change your scripts to match my scripts as found on > >the wiki ? > >I know they work, well they have for me for the last 6 years. > >

...e is coming from, but it isn't from the dhcp scripts. > I don't know what to tell you, Rowland. The previous logs were with the -d option in place, and those extra lines were what was added as a result of the -d option. Here is what the logs show WITHOUT the -d option: Jan 11 10:00:36 dc01 dhcpd[1704]: Commit: IP: 172.20.10.165 DHCID: 1:d4:be:d9:22:9f:7d Name: mgmt01 Jan 11 10:00:36 dc01 dhcpd[1704]: execute_statement argv[0] = /usr/local/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh Jan 11 10:00:36 dc01 dhcpd[1704]: execute_statement argv[1] = add Jan 11 10:00:36 dc01 dhcpd[1704]: execute_statement argv[2] =...

...or prefix if Samba isn't in /usr/local >and then try again. Here it is with script properly configured. Regarding the later lines having to do with the script, I clearly don't know what exactly is causing them. But surely they are all somehow part of this update process? Jan 10 15:46:23 dc01 dhcpd[1208]: Commit: IP: 172.20.10.165 DHCID: 1:d4:be:d9:22:9f:7d Name: mgmt01 Jan 10 15:46:23 dc01 dhcpd[1208]: execute_statement argv[0] = /usr/local/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh Jan 10 15:46:23 dc01 dhcpd[1208]: execute_statement argv[1] = add Jan 10 15:46:23 dc01 dhcpd[1208]: execute_statement argv[2] =...

...work. > >Rowland I absolutely agree with you. With the script dropped in straight off Wiki, the errors are now as follow. NOTE: the script does, of course, provide at least an exit code here. Also, nothing else was generated in samba-ad-dc or bind9 logs during this operation: Jan 10 14:31:46 dc01 dhcpd[1123]: Commit: IP: 172.20.10.165 DHCID: 1:d4:be:d9:22:9f:7d Name: mgmt01 Jan 10 14:31:46 dc01 sh[1123]: /usr/local/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh: line 10: samba: command not found Jan 10 14:31:46 dc01 dhcpd[1123]: execute_statement argv[0] = /usr/local/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh Jan 10 14:31:46 dc01 dhcpd[1123]...

On Friday, January 11, 2019 1:39 PM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:   > There doesn't seem to be anything really wrong there,the only really > difference between your named.conf and mine is that I have: >  >     dnssec-validation no; >     dnssec-enable no; >     dnssec-lookaside no; >     listen-on-v6 { none; }; >     listen-on port 53

I run "logcheck" on my servers and have noticed that my DC01 log has these: Feb 4 06:58:16 dc01 named[2096]: validating @0xb1c75c18: . NS: got insecure response; parent indicates it should be secure Feb 4 06:58:16 dc01 named[2096]: error (insecurity proof failed) resolving './NS/IN': 208.67.222.222#53 Feb 4 06:58:16 dc01 named[2096]: validating @0x...

...9;--sysconfdir=/etc' ... '--sysconfdir=/etc/bind' .... I am following the Samba Wiki for guidiance. The installation proceeded without error in all tests until I attempted to run: $ sudo samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names which returned: IPs: ['172.20.10.130'] force update: A dc01.corp.<DOMAIN>.com 172.20.10.130  * * * * * 29 DNS updates and 0 DNS deletes needed Successfully obtained Kerberos ticket to DNS/dc01.corp.<DOMAIN>.com as DC01$ update(nsupdate): A dc01.corp.<DOMAIN>.com 172.20.10.130 Calling nsupdate for A dc01.corp.<DOMAIN>.com 172.20.10.13...

On 3/13/2017 2:15 PM, Arthur Ramsey via samba wrote: > Upgraded to 4.6.0 on all nodes. Still seeing the same issue. > > If I create an object on vsc-dc02, epo-dc01 or aws-dc01 DCs it doesn't > replicate. If I create it on vsc-dc01 (PDC emulator) then it does > replicate. > > On 03/13/2017 12:13 PM, Arthur Ramsey wrote: >> >> I believe the problem is a lack of outbound replication for non PDC >> emulator DCs. You'll n...

...C emulator DCs. You'll notice isn't even trying because last successful was epoch (never) yet there are no errors. Inbound replication for this DC seems fine. [root at vsc-dc02 ~]# samba-tool drs showrepl [...]==== OUTBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mediture,DC=dom aws\AWS-DC01 via RPC DSA object GUID: 8b750a53-3d39-4bc0-8fe9-9bffa9e413aa Last attempt@ NTTIME(0) was successful 0 consecutive failure(s). Last success @ NTTIME(0) DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mediture,DC=dom epo\EPO-DC01 via RPC DSA object GUID: 28f7281f-3955-4885-8a7d-42a36ee87590 Last attempt@ NTTIME...

Changes replicate to it, but not from it. vsc\VSC-DC02 DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object GUID: fe066b13-6f9e-4f3c-beb4-37df1292b8cb DSA invocationId: 8a2b1405-07b1-4d92-89dd-1d993e59e378 ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mediture,DC=dom vsc\DC01 via RPC DSA object GUID: da9bb168-47a0-4368-aff3-bf06d1b869d2 Last attempt @ Tue Mar 14 09:26:12 2017 CDT was successful 0 consecutive failure(s). Last success @ Tue Mar 14 09:26:12 2017 CDT DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mediture,DC=dom...

I forgot to associate inter-site links (all using default), which fixed a lot though I'm still having an issue. * vsc site o vsc-dc01 o vsc-dc02 * aws site o aws-dc01 * epo site o epo-dc01 * vsc-dc01 => anywhere: OK * vsc-dc02 => anywhere: not replicating * aws-dc01 => anywhere: OK * epo-dc01 => anywhere: OK I've tried with samba_kcc = false and true. Thanks, Arthur This e-mail a...

Hi Denis, Thanks for taking the time to answer. Yes, I may have been wrong with --forced-sync and --full-sync since the start but in fact I wanted to make sure to force replication between the servers. Here is what I have noticed: - replication works from dc00 -> dc00 but not from dc01 -> dc00: [root at dc00 ~]# samba-tool drs replicate DC01 DC00 dc=ad,dc=lasthome,dc=solace,dc=krynn --sync-forced --full-sync Replicate from DC00 to DC01 was successful. [root at dc00 ~]# samba-tool drs replicate DC00 DC01 dc=ad,dc=lasthome,dc=solace,dc=krynn --sync-forced --full-sync ERROR(&l...

...I have already told you this, you must create the reverse zone, it is not created for you, use samba-tool. You do not add the reverse zone to the name flat files it goes in AD. And finally, the dhcp set up you say I 'cobbled together' works, it leads to logs like this: Sep 3 20:49:38 dc01 dhcpd: Commit: IP: 192.168.0.119 DHCID: 1:84:a6:c8:3b:da:7b Name: ThinkPad Sep 3 20:49:38 dc01 dhcpd: execute_statement argv[0] = /usr/local/sbin/dhcp-dyndns.sh Sep 3 20:49:38 dc01 dhcpd: execute_statement argv[1] = add Sep 3 20:49:38 dc01 dhcpd: execute_statement argv[2] = 192.168.0.119 Sep...

Hi all, I'm running in circles trying to debug replication failures on samba 4.7.6: dc00 : is a VM on KVM host (attached to a bridge on local LAN) dc01 : is a similarly configured VM on another KVM host. I've forcibly demoted and re-promoted dc01 but I still cannot get automatic replication to work: root at dc00 ~]# samba-tool drs showrepl Krynn\DC00 DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object GUID: 204cb904-754b-4457-af09-9347f8714006 DSA invocatio...

...considered, in addition to the smb.conf change, in addressing the current issue.===================================   CURRENT SMB.CONF   /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf =================================== [global]         bind interfaces only = Yes         interfaces = lo eno1         netbios name = DC01         realm = CORP.<DOMAIN>.COM         server role = active directory domain controller         server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate         workgroup = CORP         idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes         dns update command = /u...

...te to it, but not from it. > > vsc\VSC-DC02 > DSA Options: 0x00000001 > DSA object GUID: fe066b13-6f9e-4f3c-beb4-37df1292b8cb > DSA invocationId: 8a2b1405-07b1-4d92-89dd-1d993e59e378 > > ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== > > DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mediture,DC=dom > vsc\DC01 via RPC > DSA object GUID: da9bb168-47a0-4368-aff3-bf06d1b869d2 > Last attempt @ Tue Mar 14 09:26:12 2017 CDT was > successful > 0 consecutive failure(s). > Last success @ Tue Mar 14 09:26:12 2017 CDT > > DC=Domai...

...what happens. or.. disable dnssec in bind9 Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: bob at donelsontrophy.net >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Bob of Donelson Trophy >Verzonden: woensdag 4 februari 2015 15:05 >Aan: SAMBA MailList >Onderwerp: [Samba] DC01 log entries > > > >I run "logcheck" on my servers and have noticed that my DC01 log has >these: > >Feb 4 06:58:16 dc01 named[2096]: validating @0xb1c75c18: . NS: got >insecure response; parent indicates it should be secure >Feb 4 06:58:16 dc01 named[2096]: err...

How is the reversed domain handled, or is it not. Rowland, you did not have that in your sample you cobbled together. In /usr/share/samba/setup/named.conf there is: zone "123.168.192.in-addr.arpa" in { type master; file "123.168.192.in-addr.arpa.zone"; update-policy { grant ${REALM_WC} wildcard *.123.168.192.in-addr.arpa. PTR;