search for: dbglocalvar

...transition happens. >> >> Ok to commit? > > I'm Ok with this patch. So I'm getting some mysterious failures with this. Currently TOT is failing six tests, which look like this: [x86_64-off-dbg]: FAIL: /ptmp/dag/llvm-project.official/llvm/trunk/test/FrontendC/2010-06-28-DbgLocalVar.c [x86_64-off-dbg]: Failed with exit(1) at line 2 [x86_64-off-dbg]: while running: grep DW_TAG_structure_type 2010-06-28-DbgLocalVar.c.tmp.s | count 2 [x86_64-off-dbg]: Expected 2 lines, got 0. I am getting some additional failures with my patch that look like this: [x86_64-com-dbg]: FAIL: /ptmp/...

Hi David, On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > Now that Bruno is putting in some AVX stuff, it's a good motivator to > move my x86 SIMD reorg work into trunk (and got management to agree to > prioritize it - Thanks Bruno! :) ). > > Attached is the first patch of many to accomplish this.  The overall > goal is to have all x86 SIMD

Now that Bruno is putting in some AVX stuff, it's a good motivator to move my x86 SIMD reorg work into trunk (and got management to agree to prioritize it - Thanks Bruno! :) ). Attached is the first patch of many to accomplish this. The overall goal is to have all x86 SIMD instructions share a set of common patterns so that we can have a more maintainable machine description (e.g. SS, SD,