Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "dbginfoversion".
2018 May 29
2
Can creating new forms of debug info metadata be simplified? [formatting fixed]
...se constexpr to unroll many things at compile-time. That could be fun!
Backward compatibility for serialization is also achievable using a method very similar to Boost serialization[2]:
template<typename Visitor>
void visit(Visitor & v) {
v.keys("Version1Property");
if(v.dbgInfoVersion >= 2) // always the latest when serializing out
v.property("Version2Property",Version2Property);
if(v.dbgInfoVersion >= 1) // otherwise set to the version when reading back in
v.property("Version1Property","Version1Property");
}
If either of the a...
2018 May 29
0
Can creating new forms of debug info metadata be simplified? [formatting fixed]
...s at compile-time. That could be fun!
>
> Backward compatibility for serialization is also achievable using a method very similar to Boost serialization[2]:
>
> template<typename Visitor>
> void visit(Visitor & v) {
> v.keys("Version1Property");
> if(v.dbgInfoVersion >= 2) // always the latest when serializing out
> v.property("Version2Property",Version2Property);
> if(v.dbgInfoVersion >= 1) // otherwise set to the version when reading back in
> v.property("Version1Property","Version1Property");
> }
A...
2018 May 29
0
Can creating new forms of debug info metadata be simplified? [formatting fixed]
> On May 29, 2018, at 12:55, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On May 29, 2018, at 12:28 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> +some of the debug info cabal (& Duncan, as an emeritus member, and person who plumbed a lot of the current debug info syntax support in)
>>
2018 May 29
2
Can creating new forms of debug info metadata be simplified? [formatting fixed]
> On May 29, 2018, at 12:28 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +some of the debug info cabal (& Duncan, as an emeritus member, and person who plumbed a lot of the current debug info syntax support in)
>
> Visitor seems plausible though I haven't looked at the code in detail to see if it'd work perfectly.
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:56