Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "dbfc35d6".
2008 Feb 15
2
[LLVMdev] Some blogged LLVM experience.
...dvanced countries underestimate by a factor of two to four
the ability of people in underdeveloped countries to do anything
technical. (Charles P Issawi)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080215/dbfc35d6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080215/dbfc35d6/attachm...
2008 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] Some blogged LLVM experience.
Hi Michael, thanks for trying out LLVM!
"The bad news comes with the make test-all results. Less than two minutes
into the comprehensive test suite the LLVM-GCC version of Ruby 1.9 dies with
the following message: "Illegal instruction (core dumped)". Later it tells me
the test failed with "error 132". This is, as you can see, not a very useful
message since it's not
2008 Feb 15
3
[LLVMdev] Some blogged LLVM experience.
http://snakeratpig.blogspot.com/2008/02/alternative-compiler-suites.html
Executive summary: LLVM-GCC was consistently faster and its output
consistently faster than plain old GCC when compiling and using Ruby
1.9. Both compilers failed spectacularly on the full regression suite,
but GCC lasted longer and did more tests before exploding.
If I could find a comprehensive Erlang testing suite,