Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "dbdc9896".
Did you mean:
0dbd9896
2019 Dec 04
2
[cfe-dev] clang and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1
..._______________
> > cfe-dev mailing list
> > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191204/dbdc9896/attachment.html>
2019 Dec 03
5
clang and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1
Hi folks (CCing llvm-dev, but that's probably more of a cfe-dev topic),
As a follow-up to that old thread about -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=n
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-November/045845.html
And, more recently, to this fedora thread where clang/llvm -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE
support is claimed to be only partial:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2020
I dig into the glibc headers in