Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "dbcad570d4fb9b7005550ff630543b37".
2018 Sep 19
4
Bias in R's random integers?
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 13:43, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the default
> is likely to be accepted as it would make it more difficult to reproduce
> older results.
I'm a bit alarmed by the logic here. Unbiased sampling seems basic for a
statistical language. As a consumer of R I'd
2018 Sep 19
0
Bias in R's random integers?
...ng away from the "buggy Kinderman-Ramage"
generator, back in the day? (Version 1.7 was sometime between 2001 and
2004).
I couldn't find the exact commit in the GitHub mirror: this is related ...
https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/7ad3044639fd1fe093c655e573fd1a67aa7f55f6#diff-dbcad570d4fb9b7005550ff630543b37
===
?normal.kind? can be ?"Kinderman-Ramage"?, ?"Buggy
Kinderman-Ramage"? (not for ?set.seed?), ?"Ahrens-Dieter"?,
?"Box-Muller"?, ?"Inversion"? (the default), or ?"user-supplied"?.
(For inversion, see the reference in ?q...
2018 Sep 20
1
Bias in R's random integers?
...n it. This is a simple fix but reverse
dependencies may make it look like lots of things are broken.
Paul Gilbert
> I couldn't find the exact commit in the GitHub mirror: this is related ...
>
> https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/7ad3044639fd1fe093c655e573fd1a67aa7f55f6#diff-dbcad570d4fb9b7005550ff630543b37
>
>
>
> ===
> ?normal.kind? can be ?"Kinderman-Ramage"?, ?"Buggy
> Kinderman-Ramage"? (not for ?set.seed?), ?"Ahrens-Dieter"?,
> ?"Box-Muller"?, ?"Inversion"? (the default), or ?"user-supplied"?.
>...