Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "db_id".
Did you mean:
cb_id
2014 Mar 31
0
ctdb issue: existing header for db_id 0xf2a58948 has larger RSN 1 than new RSN 1 in ctdb_persistent_store
Hello
I find the following email form internet, and I have the same problem, can you share your information about this issue?
[Samba] ctdb issue: existing header for db_id 0xf2a58948 has larger RSN 1 than new RSN 1 in ctdb_persistent_store
Nate Hardt nate at scalecomputing.com <mailto:samba%40lists.samba.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BSamba%5D%20ctdb%20issue%3A%20existing%20header%20for%20db_id%200xf2a58948%20has%20larger%0A%20RSN%201%20than%20new%20RSN%201%20in%20ctdb_pe...
2008 Jan 25
1
Logit Regressions, Clustering etc
...Assuming it is, the part I am really struggling with is the calculation of
robust standard errors to allow for clustering. In an "ordinary"
regression, I?ve used survreg, where the data has also been censored, e.g.:
res1 <- survreg(formula = Surv(ip, db_Censor) ~ y1 +
y5 + cluster(db_ID),
dist = "gaussian")
summary(res1)
This has the benefit of giving a nice clear display of the na?ve standard
error as well as the robust one - is there any way of getting similar output
for a logit and an ordered logit regression
Thanks in advance for your help.
2012 Apr 17
0
CTDB panics when vacuuming serverid.tdb
...er/ctdb_daemon.c:188 Registered
message handler for srvid=18302628885633695744
2012/04/17 14:57:33.259237 [18864]: server/ctdb_daemon.c:188 Registered
message handler for srvid=13712550619516882333
2012/04/17 14:57:33.259703 [18864]: server/ctdb_vacuum.c:1484 schedule
for deletion: db[serverid.tdb] db_id[0x9ec2a880] key_hash[0x4d617955]
lmaster[0] migrated_with_data[no]
2012/04/17 14:57:33.259722 [18864]:
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2012/04/17 14:57:33.259729 [18864]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in ctdbd
pid 188642012/04/17 14:57:33.259734 [18864]:
Please read the...