search for: davinci

Hi, My company just recently bought a TI DaVinci development board and I'm trying to port Speex to run on it. The TI DaVinci chip has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I was able to get Speex somewhat working on a TMS320VC5510 about a year ago but I was wondering is there anything special I need to do to get Speex working on t...

...need to get just the narrow band working now (maybe use advanced features such as jitter buffer, echo cancellation, VAD, etc in the future); the DSP will do the encode and decode simultaneously as data are available. My main objective is just do a voice application that runs on the ARM side of the DaVinci with the codec running on the DSP side; the application on the ARM will get from and give to the DSP Speex encoded data via shared memory. On the outbound flow (to ARM), the DSP basically continuously samples a mic, encodes it in Speex format, and give it to the application on the ARM side via the...

Hi, My company just recently bought a TI DaVinci development board and I'm trying to port Speex to run on it. The TI DaVinci chip has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I was able to get Speex somewhat working on a TMS320VC5510 about a year ago but I was wondering is there anything special I need to do to get Speex working on t...

...s, > Andy Ngo > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> > To: ndno72-speex@yahoo.com > Cc: jtrantow@ieee.org; speex-dev@xiph.org > Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2006 2:52:02 PM > Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Speex support for TI DaVinci processor > > Hi Andy, > > Speex itself (the library) should work fine on the C64xx because from > the libspeex point of view, just just another 32-bit architecture with > no FPU. There wasn't anything special to do to port Speex to the C64 > (unlike the C5x). > >...

...building the library? Thanks. Regards, Andy Ngo ----- Original Message ---- From: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> To: ndno72-speex@yahoo.com Cc: jtrantow@ieee.org; speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2006 2:52:02 PM Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Speex support for TI DaVinci processor Hi Andy, Speex itself (the library) should work fine on the C64xx because from the libspeex point of view, just just another 32-bit architecture with no FPU. There wasn't anything special to do to port Speex to the C64 (unlike the C5x). Jean-Marc ndno72-speex@yahoo.com a ?cri...

...tunities to optimize Speex following the BlackFin example. -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of ndno72-speex@yahoo.com Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 5:18 PM To: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: [Speex-dev] Speex support for TI DaVinci processor Hi, My company just recently bought a TI DaVinci development board and I'm trying to port Speex to run on it. The TI DaVinci chip has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I was able to get Speex somewhat working on a TMS320VC5510 about a year ago but I was wonderi...

Hi Jean-Marc, I have tested Speex in fixed-point mode on my PC without clicking noise. As I mentioned below, I tested Speex in fixed-point mode running natively on the ARM side of the DaVinci without click noise. I only get the clicking noise when running Speex on the DSP side. For the TI C64+ DSP on the DaVinci processor, the TI-specific switches doesn't do much other than defining the different Speex data types (spx_int16_t, spx_uint16_t, spx_int32_t, etc) and the static heap a...

Hi, I've been trying to get Speex to compile and run on the DSP of TI's new DaVinci System-On-Chip processor, which has both an ARM (ARM926) and a DSP (C64+, based on the C6400). I used the latest code (1.2beta) and followed the example in the speex- 1.2beta1/ti/speex_C64_test trunk to build the Speex library for the DSP. Basically I have a loopback application on the ARM that s...

Hi, I am attempting to port the speex library to TI Davinci DM35x Family. My questions are: 1. What is the best ./configure option for it? Is it ARM5e / ARM4 ? when I tried these two the during the compiled a warning "I suppose you can have a [ARM4/ARM5E/Blackfin] that has float instructions?" 2. is there any available demos for the ec...

...> Apr 14 19:30:30 thebighonker dovecot[2507]: imap(ler/14813): Logged > out in=12412 out=66691 fhc=0 fhb=0 fbc=0 fbb=0 del=0 exp=0 trash=0 > Apr 14 19:30:54 thebighonker exim[14846]: no host name found for IP > address 23.100.68.192 > Apr 14 19:30:55 thebighonker exim[14846]: > H=(DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com > <http://DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com>) [23.100.68.192]:52130 > I=[192.147.25.65]:25 sender verify defer for <info at duke.org > <mailto:info at duke.org>>: host lookup did not complete > Apr 14 19:30:55 thebighonker exim[14846]: > H=(DaVin...

Am having difficulty in getting the fileserver part of puppet 0.18.4 on centos 4 working fully in respect to %h / %H. In file server.conf I have the following defined [private] path /var/lib/puppet/files/%h allow * In ''/var/lib/puppet/files/davinci/'' the source file up2date.sources.centos(davinci being hostname). And in manifiest have file { "/etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources": source => "puppet://localhost/private/up2date.sources.centos", backup => main, ow...

(Resending since the archive seems to have eaten the text.) I'm working on getting Speex running on a TI Davinci (6441), on both the ARM and the DSP. My immediate goal is to understand the processing requirements on different architectures so that I can properly specific an engineering project. I have it up and running on the ARM, and I just wanted to see if anyone could sanity-check my results before I c...

...thebighonker dovecot[2507]: imap(ler/14813): Logged >> out in=12412 out=66691 fhc=0 fhb=0 fbc=0 fbb=0 del=0 exp=0 trash=0 >> Apr 14 19:30:54 thebighonker exim[14846]: no host name found for IP >> address 23.100.68.192 >> Apr 14 19:30:55 thebighonker exim[14846]: >> H=(DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com >> <http://DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com>) [23.100.68.192]:52130 >> I=[192.147.25.65]:25 sender verify defer for <info at duke.org >> <mailto:info at duke.org>>: host lookup did not complete >> Apr 14 19:30:55 thebighonker exim[14846...

...t[2507]: imap(ler/14813): Logged >>> out in=12412 out=66691 fhc=0 fhb=0 fbc=0 fbb=0 del=0 exp=0 trash=0 >>> Apr 14 19:30:54 thebighonker exim[14846]: no host name found for IP >>> address 23.100.68.192 >>> Apr 14 19:30:55 thebighonker exim[14846]: >>> H=(DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com >>> <http://DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com>) [23.100.68.192]:52130 >>> I=[192.147.25.65]:25 sender verify defer for <info at duke.org >>> <mailto:info at duke.org>>: host lookup did not complete >>> Apr 14 19:30:55 thebigh...

Hi, I'm currently working on the TI DaVinci processor, which has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I have been using Speex 6kbps (narrowband, quality=2, complexity=1, perceptual_enh=0) on the DSP C64+ side without any issues; the voice sounds very good for such a low bandwidth requirement. However, recently, I tried out the 4...

...GwYMgAQRwHw8DrQC73P/+UNkA> Apr 14 19:30:30 thebighonker dovecot[2507]: imap(ler/14813): Logged out in=12412 out=66691 fhc=0 fhb=0 fbc=0 fbb=0 del=0 exp=0 trash=0 Apr 14 19:30:54 thebighonker exim[14846]: no host name found for IP address 23.100.68.192 Apr 14 19:30:55 thebighonker exim[14846]: H=(DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com<http://DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com>) [23.100.68.192]:52130 I=[192.147.25.65]:25 sender verify defer for <info at duke.org<mailto:info at duke.org>>: host lookup did not complete Apr 14 19:30:55 thebighonker exim[14846]: H=(DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com&l...

On 15/04/2019 01:39, Larry Rosenman via dovecot wrote: > > full solr.log at: > https://www.lerctr.org/~ler/solr.log > > The search DOES make it to SOLR: > ?77% [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] 130 $ grep sysutils > /var/log/solr/solr.log > 2019-04-14 18:31:34.749 INFO? (qtp349420578-7538) [? ?x:dovecot] > o.a.s.c.S.Request [dovecot]? webapp=/solr path=/select >

...your help! Regards, Andy ----- Original Message ---- From: Jim Crichton <jim.crichton@comcast.net> To: Andy Ngo <ndno72-speex@yahoo.com> Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 10:51:10 AM Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Re: Clicking noise using Speex built for TI C64+ DSP ofDaVinci Processor Andy, Send me the wav file and I will try to help you. Also, please send the encoded output from female.wav. Have you looked at the output audio with a waveform editor, to see if you can find the clicking? Have you tried running the sample build in the C64x simulator? That would...

...GwYMgAQRwHw8DrQC73P/+UNkA> Apr 14 19:30:30 thebighonker dovecot[2507]: imap(ler/14813): Logged out in=12412 out=66691 fhc=0 fhb=0 fbc=0 fbb=0 del=0 exp=0 trash=0 Apr 14 19:30:54 thebighonker exim[14846]: no host name found for IP address 23.100.68.192 Apr 14 19:30:55 thebighonker exim[14846]: H=(DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com<http://DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com>) [23.100.68.192]:52130 I=[192.147.25.65]:25 sender verify defer for <info at duke.org<mailto:info at duke.org>>: host lookup did not complete Apr 14 19:30:55 thebighonker exim[14846]: H=(DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com&l...

...GwYMgAQRwHw8DrQC73P/+UNkA> Apr 14 19:30:30 thebighonker dovecot[2507]: imap(ler/14813): Logged out in=12412 out=66691 fhc=0 fhb=0 fbc=0 fbb=0 del=0 exp=0 trash=0 Apr 14 19:30:54 thebighonker exim[14846]: no host name found for IP address 23.100.68.192 Apr 14 19:30:55 thebighonker exim[14846]: H=(DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com<http://DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com>) [23.100.68.192]:52130 I=[192.147.25.65]:25 sender verify defer for <info at duke.org<mailto:info at duke.org>>: host lookup did not complete Apr 14 19:30:55 thebighonker exim[14846]: H=(DaVinci-MWare.prophet21lab.com&l...