search for: davfs

I have installed fuse-davfs2-1.2.2-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm but mount -t davfs http://URL /mnt/dav gets /sbin/mount.davfs: group davfs2 does not exist what did I miss in the install???

man mount.davfs provides an entry in fstab for -t davfs. Does simply adding this into fstab complete the task, or is a reboot needed? (or some service restarted).

Hello: As many of you already probably know, the neon library is the workhorse for davfs support. However, right now, the current version of libneon has very limited support for NTLM, particularly NTLMv2, both on the challenge/authentication side as well as handling NTLMv2 Session Security. There is a patch somewhere to add NTLMv2 authentication support natively but there is zero sup...

I just did a yum update. It pulled in a number of updates including the latest firefox and davfs2.i386. Then I watch the following show up during the cleanup phase of yum (/var/log/messages): Mar 28 15:42:18 nc2400 Erased: jdk Mar 28 15:42:25 nc2400 Erased: jre Mar 28 15:42:31 nc2400 Erased: fuse-davfs2 Are the first jsut removal of the alternatives? How do I tell and how do I find that...

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:03:34AM -0400, pisymbol . via samba wrote: > Hello: > > As many of you already probably know, the neon library is the workhorse for > davfs support. > > However, right now, the current version of libneon has very limited support > for NTLM, particularly NTLMv2, both on the challenge/authentication side as > well as handling NTLMv2 Session Security. > > There is a patch somewhere to add NTLMv2 authentication support...

...p://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Authenticate/Ntlm Jeremy, thanks! That's exactly what I was looking at. So here's a better question: Can you give me a brief technical explanation on how this exactly works with respect to establishing a session? The goal is basically to have mount.davfs first establish an NTLMv2 session (using 128-bit encryption) and then be able to access files through it using standard filesystem calls. The config example above is nice, but it doesn't really drill into how this all works. Btw, full NTLMv2 Session Security is supported with samba3+ right?...

...th NTLMSSP over mouse-buffer between that and > > the > > squid-2.5-ntlmssp server mode.  Set --password on the server and it > > becomes standalone binary that does not need Samba running. > > It does, but I need to understand the flow better on how I can funnel > mount davfs traffic through it (I thought originally this could be > done using upcall but that doesn't make sense - I think). You pass only the NTLM headers via ntlm_auth, the rest you keep in the binary that makes the actual socket connection. > I do appreciate the feedback gentlemen. Thanks!...

...Jeremy, thanks! That's exactly what I was looking at. > > > > So here's a better question: Can you give me a brief technical > > explanation > > on how this exactly works with respect to establishing a session? > > The goal > > is basically to have mount.davfs first establish an NTLMv2 session > > (using > > 128-bit encryption) and then be able to access files through it > > using > > standard filesystem calls. > > Not quickly. Probably best to look into the squid code itself > and see how they drive it. Also look into...

...rver to act as a proxy to webdav servers. This would give windows users the ability to browse webdav pseudo-shares and map them to a drive letter, without buying software like "WebDrive". I am setting up a quick and dirty "proof of concept" software, plugging samba (server) and davfs (webdav client) together, and it seems to work fine. My questions are : - Is anybody already working on such idea ? - What are your opinions about this possible feature of samba ? - Would anybody like to take the lead of such a project ? Thank you for your attention. -- Arnaud Bienvenu http://w...

...gured. > You can also play with NTLMSSP over mouse-buffer between that and the > squid-2.5-ntlmssp server mode. Set --password on the server and it > becomes standalone binary that does not need Samba running. It does, but I need to understand the flow better on how I can funnel mount davfs traffic through it (I thought originally this could be done using upcall but that doesn't make sense - I think). I do appreciate the feedback gentlemen. -aps

...at. Another good example is LDAP, which > allowed (until we turned it off by default in Samba) LDAP binds without > the subsequent encryption. > > Sadly HTTP has no 'subsequent encryption' option that I'm aware of. > > I would assume once the socket has been setup the davfs commands would go over the NTLMv2 encrypted session? Did I miss something here? -aps