Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "databuffer".
Did you mean:
data_buffer
2010 Aug 31
2
[PATCH 2/5] staging: hv: Fixed lockup problem with bounce_buffer scatter list - RESEND
...scatterlist *sgl;
+ unsigned int sg_count = 0;
DPRINT_DBG(STORVSC_DRV, "scmnd %p dir %d, use_sg %d buf %p len %d "
"queue depth %d tagged %d", scmnd, scmnd->sc_data_direction,
@@ -697,6 +698,7 @@ static int storvsc_queuecommand(struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd,
request->DataBuffer.Length = scsi_bufflen(scmnd);
if (scsi_sg_count(scmnd)) {
sgl = (struct scatterlist *)scsi_sglist(scmnd);
+ sg_count = scsi_sg_count(scmnd);
/* check if we need to bounce the sgl */
if (do_bounce_buffer(sgl, scsi_sg_count(scmnd)) != -1) {
@@ -731,15 +733,16 @@ static int storvsc_queue...
2010 Aug 31
2
[PATCH 2/5] staging: hv: Fixed lockup problem with bounce_buffer scatter list - RESEND
...scatterlist *sgl;
+ unsigned int sg_count = 0;
DPRINT_DBG(STORVSC_DRV, "scmnd %p dir %d, use_sg %d buf %p len %d "
"queue depth %d tagged %d", scmnd, scmnd->sc_data_direction,
@@ -697,6 +698,7 @@ static int storvsc_queuecommand(struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd,
request->DataBuffer.Length = scsi_bufflen(scmnd);
if (scsi_sg_count(scmnd)) {
sgl = (struct scatterlist *)scsi_sglist(scmnd);
+ sg_count = scsi_sg_count(scmnd);
/* check if we need to bounce the sgl */
if (do_bounce_buffer(sgl, scsi_sg_count(scmnd)) != -1) {
@@ -731,15 +733,16 @@ static int storvsc_queue...
2010 Aug 03
1
[PATCH 2/6] staging: hv: Fixed lockup problem with bounce_buffer scatter list
...scatterlist *sgl;
+ unsigned int sg_count = 0;
DPRINT_DBG(STORVSC_DRV, "scmnd %p dir %d, use_sg %d buf %p len %d "
"queue depth %d tagged %d", scmnd, scmnd->sc_data_direction, @@ -697,6 +698,7 @@ static int storvsc_queuecommand(struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd,
request->DataBuffer.Length = scsi_bufflen(scmnd);
if (scsi_sg_count(scmnd)) {
sgl = (struct scatterlist *)scsi_sglist(scmnd);
+ sg_count = scsi_sg_count(scmnd);
/* check if we need to bounce the sgl */
if (do_bounce_buffer(sgl, scsi_sg_count(scmnd)) != -1) { @@ -731,15 +733,16 @@ static int storvsc_queue...
2010 Aug 03
1
[PATCH 2/6] staging: hv: Fixed lockup problem with bounce_buffer scatter list
...scatterlist *sgl;
+ unsigned int sg_count = 0;
DPRINT_DBG(STORVSC_DRV, "scmnd %p dir %d, use_sg %d buf %p len %d "
"queue depth %d tagged %d", scmnd, scmnd->sc_data_direction, @@ -697,6 +698,7 @@ static int storvsc_queuecommand(struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd,
request->DataBuffer.Length = scsi_bufflen(scmnd);
if (scsi_sg_count(scmnd)) {
sgl = (struct scatterlist *)scsi_sglist(scmnd);
+ sg_count = scsi_sg_count(scmnd);
/* check if we need to bounce the sgl */
if (do_bounce_buffer(sgl, scsi_sg_count(scmnd)) != -1) { @@ -731,15 +733,16 @@ static int storvsc_queue...
2010 Aug 05
1
[PATCH 2/5] staging: hv: Fixed lockup problem with bounce_buffer scatter list
...scatterlist *sgl;
+ unsigned int sg_count = 0;
DPRINT_DBG(STORVSC_DRV, "scmnd %p dir %d, use_sg %d buf %p len %d "
"queue depth %d tagged %d", scmnd, scmnd->sc_data_direction, @@ -697,6 +698,7 @@ static int storvsc_queuecommand(struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd,
request->DataBuffer.Length = scsi_bufflen(scmnd);
if (scsi_sg_count(scmnd)) {
sgl = (struct scatterlist *)scsi_sglist(scmnd);
+ sg_count = scsi_sg_count(scmnd);
/* check if we need to bounce the sgl */
if (do_bounce_buffer(sgl, scsi_sg_count(scmnd)) != -1) { @@ -731,15 +733,16 @@ static int storvsc_queue...
2010 Aug 05
1
[PATCH 2/5] staging: hv: Fixed lockup problem with bounce_buffer scatter list
...scatterlist *sgl;
+ unsigned int sg_count = 0;
DPRINT_DBG(STORVSC_DRV, "scmnd %p dir %d, use_sg %d buf %p len %d "
"queue depth %d tagged %d", scmnd, scmnd->sc_data_direction, @@ -697,6 +698,7 @@ static int storvsc_queuecommand(struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd,
request->DataBuffer.Length = scsi_bufflen(scmnd);
if (scsi_sg_count(scmnd)) {
sgl = (struct scatterlist *)scsi_sglist(scmnd);
+ sg_count = scsi_sg_count(scmnd);
/* check if we need to bounce the sgl */
if (do_bounce_buffer(sgl, scsi_sg_count(scmnd)) != -1) { @@ -731,15 +733,16 @@ static int storvsc_queue...
2010 Dec 06
7
[PATCH 1/8] staging: hv: Convert camel case struct fields in vstorage.h to lowercase
...gt;VmSrb.Cdb, Request->Cdb, Request->CdbLen);
+ vstorPacket->vm_srb.cdb_length = Request->CdbLen;
+ memcpy(&vstorPacket->vm_srb.cdb, Request->Cdb, Request->CdbLen);
- vstorPacket->VmSrb.DataIn = Request->Type;
- vstorPacket->VmSrb.DataTransferLength = Request->DataBuffer.Length;
+ vstorPacket->vm_srb.data_in = Request->Type;
+ vstorPacket->vm_srb.data_transfer_length = Request->DataBuffer.Length;
- vstorPacket->Operation = VStorOperationExecuteSRB;
+ vstorPacket->operation = VSTOR_OPERATION_EXECUTE_SRB;
DPRINT_DBG(STORVSC, "srb - len %d...
2010 Dec 06
7
[PATCH 1/8] staging: hv: Convert camel case struct fields in vstorage.h to lowercase
...gt;VmSrb.Cdb, Request->Cdb, Request->CdbLen);
+ vstorPacket->vm_srb.cdb_length = Request->CdbLen;
+ memcpy(&vstorPacket->vm_srb.cdb, Request->Cdb, Request->CdbLen);
- vstorPacket->VmSrb.DataIn = Request->Type;
- vstorPacket->VmSrb.DataTransferLength = Request->DataBuffer.Length;
+ vstorPacket->vm_srb.data_in = Request->Type;
+ vstorPacket->vm_srb.data_transfer_length = Request->DataBuffer.Length;
- vstorPacket->Operation = VStorOperationExecuteSRB;
+ vstorPacket->operation = VSTOR_OPERATION_EXECUTE_SRB;
DPRINT_DBG(STORVSC, "srb - len %d...
2013 Feb 12
0
Speexdec says: 'This doesn't look like a Speex file' (am I missing headers?)
...} ...
} ...
}
sbufToTrackReadiness = 0x0
numSamples = 375
sampleTimingArray[1] = {
{PTS = {82626949766094/1000000000 = 82626.950, rounded}, DTS =
{INVALID}, duration = {1/44100 = 0.000}},
}
sampleSizeArray[1] = {
sampleSize = 2,
}
dataBuffer = 0x6e7a40
b) Actual data which is kept in aforementioned buffer (for the sake of
completeness):
0f001400 0b000d00 04000a00 f7ff1300 0a000300 f9ff1c00 1b001c00 f9ffc0ff
bfffadff b7ff86ff 7cff5fff 63ff67ff 84ffb5ff bbffd4ff e4ff1500 1c001000
04001400 39002500 27005000 44002000 e7ffe5ff c7ffd7ff b...
2013 Feb 12
0
Speexdec says: 'This doesn't look like a Speex file' (am I missing headers?).
...} ...
} ...
}
sbufToTrackReadiness = 0x0
numSamples = 375
sampleTimingArray[1] = {
{PTS = {82626949766094/1000000000 = 82626.950, rounded}, DTS = {INVALID}, duration = {1/44100 = 0.000}},
}
sampleSizeArray[1] = {
sampleSize = 2,
}
dataBuffer = 0x6e7a40
b) Actual data which is kept in aforementioned buffer (for the sake of completeness):
0f001400 0b000d00 04000a00 f7ff1300 0a000300 f9ff1c00 1b001c00 f9ffc0ff
bfffadff b7ff86ff 7cff5fff 63ff67ff 84ffb5ff bbffd4ff e4ff1500 1c001000
04001400 39002500 27005000 44002000 e7ffe5ff c7ffd7ff b...
2013 Feb 12
0
Speexdec says: 'This doesn't look like a Speex file' (am I missing headers?).
...} ...
} ...
}
sbufToTrackReadiness = 0x0
numSamples = 375
sampleTimingArray[1] = {
{PTS = {82626949766094/1000000000 = 82626.950, rounded}, DTS =
{INVALID}, duration = {1/44100 = 0.000}},
}
sampleSizeArray[1] = {
sampleSize = 2,
}
dataBuffer = 0x6e7a40
b) Actual data which is kept in aforementioned buffer (for the sake of
completeness):
0f001400 0b000d00 04000a00 f7ff1300 0a000300 f9ff1c00 1b001c00 f9ffc0ff
bfffadff b7ff86ff 7cff5fff 63ff67ff 84ffb5ff bbffd4ff e4ff1500 1c001000
04001400 39002500 27005000 44002000 e7ffe5ff c7ffd7ff b...
2013 Feb 12
0
Speexdec says: 'This doesn't look like a Speex file' (am I missing headers?)
...} ...
} ...
}
sbufToTrackReadiness = 0x0
numSamples = 375
sampleTimingArray[1] = {
{PTS = {82626949766094/1000000000 = 82626.950, rounded}, DTS = {INVALID}, duration = {1/44100 = 0.000}},
}
sampleSizeArray[1] = {
sampleSize = 2,
}
dataBuffer = 0x6e7a40
b) Actual data which is kept in aforementioned buffer (for the sake of completeness):
0f001400 0b000d00 04000a00 f7ff1300 0a000300 f9ff1c00 1b001c00 f9ffc0ff
bfffadff b7ff86ff 7cff5fff 63ff67ff 84ffb5ff bbffd4ff e4ff1500 1c001000
04001400 39002500 27005000 44002000 e7ffe5ff c7ffd7ff b...
2006 Sep 07
2
Getting subframe type=verbatim on 16 bit files
Here's how I set up the data for processing:
// For moving data into 32 bit shape
uint8_t *buffer8 = NULL;
uint16_t *buffer16 = NULL;
uint32_t *buffer32 = NULL;
unsigned sample32;
unsigned sample, channel;
uint32_t bitsPerSample = this->get_bits_per_sample();
numFrames = inData.GetSize();
2007 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH (rest of code changes) "bytecode" --> "bitcode"
Here is the bulk of the sanitizing.
My residual doubts center around the question
whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code
in 2.0/2.1.
I need a definitive word on this to proceed.
My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are
still some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code
(instead of *bit*code).
I did not touch those areas, so the attached