search for: data_date

...Rain_mm_Tot 2017-05-29 23:40:00 4.7999980 2017-05-29 23:50:00 1.2000000 2017-05-30 00:10:00 2.5800000 2017-05-30 00:20:00 1.2009600 2017-05-30 00:30:00 1.2000006 2017-05-30 00:40:00 2.5002480 First I tried to define the column as date format with: data_date <-data[as.Date(data_date$Timestamp)<=as.Date("2017-06-15"),] Then I tried to aggregate as followed: data_date_sum <- aggregate(data_date$Timestamp, on = "days", k=1, by=list(cut(as.Date(data_date$Date))), FUN=sum) R responds: Error in as.Date.default(data_date$Date...

In a code segment of my pass plugin, I try to gather AliasSets for all StoreInst, LoadInst and CallInst instructions in a function. Some behaviors of the pass puzzled me. Below is the *.ll of the test program which I run the pass on, it was get with "llvm-gcc -Wl,--disable-opt" from a rather simple *.c program. ---------------------------------- ; ModuleID = 'ptralias.bc'

Oh, I appologize that I should not have asked about __main() ---- it appears in FAQ. But the question remains that why call to __main() can alias stack location? I think the memory location pointed by data_X pointers are not visible to __main(). In comparison, calls to printf() do not have similar effect. On 5/14/06, Nai Xia <nelson.xia at gmail.com> wrote: > > In a code segment of

Hi Chris, I took a haste look at the "Points-to Analysis in Almost Linear Time" by Steens , your PHD thesis and SteensGaard.cpp in LLVM this afternoon. So I think: 1. Actually the basic algorithm described originally by SteensGaard does not provide MOD/REF information for functions. 2. The context insensitive part of Data Structure Analysis (LocalAnalysis) can be deemed as an

On Tuesday 16 May 2006 03:19, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 15 May 2006, Nai Xia wrote: > > > In other words, if I only use -steens-aa and the data_XXXs are all > > external global variables( and so inComplete ), > > Sounds right! > > > the call to printf will > > make the same effect, which I have tested it. > > > > Am I right ? :) >

On Wed, 17 May 2006, Nai Xia wrote: > Unfortunately, I did not locate the lines in steens-aa for "printf" special case. > In ds-aa, I found the lines below: Right, steens-aa and ds-aa share code for "local analysis", they just stitch it together into an interprocedural analysis in different ways. The code below is used for steens-aa. >

On Mon, 15 May 2006, Nai Xia wrote: > In other words, if I only use -steens-aa and the data_XXXs are all > external global variables( and so inComplete ), Sounds right! > the call to printf will > make the same effect, which I have tested it. > > Am I right ? :) If you've tested it then, yes you're right :). I haven't played with this stuff for a long time,

...uses a normal resource. If you have a belongs_to, has_one/many relationship between models is that automatically an indication of a nested resource or can these resources still be represented in the normal resource way? I have a resource (talker) that belongs_to a number of other models (network, data_date, talker_type etc) in a many to one relationship and I''d like to be able to have something like: /networks/1/talkers/10 /data_dates/1/talkers/10 /talker_types/1/talkers/10 but also /talkers/10 Is it possible to do this? or do I need to rename each of the nested parts of the url to somet...

Hi, What''s the best way to add support for the activeresource find method in the controllers in my rails app? As I understand it when you invoke something like: Person.find(:all, :params => {:name = ''toby''}) this generates a request of: GET /people.xml?name=toby Does this mean that in my index method in PeopleController in my rails app I have params[name] set to