search for: data_as

Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "data_as".

Did you mean: data_ac
2006 Nov 08
2
interprete wilcox.test results
Dear All, I am using wilcox.test to test two samples, data_a and data_b, earch sample has 3 replicates, suppose data_a and data_b are 20*3 matrix. Then I used the following to test the null hypothesis (they are from same distribution.): wilcox.test(x=data_a, y=data_b, alternative="g") I got pvalue = 1.90806170863311e-09. When I switched data_a and data_b by doing the following:
2012 Apr 30
0
Extracting coefficients values with bootstrap
...tary rocks GeoRockoffshelf miogeoclinal rocks GeoRocksedimentary and mafic volcanic rocks GeoRockundivided sedimentary rocks GeoRockundivided volcanic rocks There is basically 1 variable (LogRds_25k) and 1 categorical variable (GeoRock) with 10 categories. Here is my script: N = length (data_As[,1]) B = 10000 stor.r2 = rep(0,B) stor.inter = rep(0,B) stor.Rds = rep(0,B) stor.Bimod = rep(0,B) stor.grano = rep(0,B) stor.mafic_intru = rep(0,B) stor.mafic_vol = rep(0,B) stor.nonmarine = rep(0,B) stor.iffshelf = rep(0,B) stor.sedi = rep(0,B) stor.vol = rep(0,B) for (i in 1:B){ idx = sample(1...
2008 Apr 02
2
including a variable in another variable name
Dear R community, I wish to include a variable (e.g. slice of "a" below) in another variable's name. My objective would be to get a variable-name "data_A" and so on. How can I do this? > a<-LETTERS[1:25] > a [1] "A" "B" "C" "D" "E" "F" "G" "H" "I" "J"
2006 Feb 09
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3492] New: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (24 bytes read so far)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3492 Summary: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (24 bytes read so far) Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2018 Jan 31
2
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
Nithya, Responding to an earlier question: Before the upgrade, we were at 3.103 on these servers, but some of the clients were 3.7.6. From below, does this mean that ?shared-brick-count? needs to be set to 1 for all bricks. All of the bricks are on separate xfs partitions composed hardware of RAID 6 volumes. LVM is not used. The current setting for cluster.min-free-inodes was 5%. I changed it to
2018 Jan 31
2
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
The values for shared-brick-count are still the same. I did not re-start the volume after setting the cluster.min-free-inodes to 6%. Do I need to restart it? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:14 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at
2018 Jan 31
0
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
On 31 January 2018 at 21:34, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > Responding to an earlier question: Before the upgrade, we were at 3.103 on > these servers, but some of the clients were 3.7.6. From below, does this > mean that ?shared-brick-count? needs to be set to 1 for all bricks. > > > > All of the bricks are on separate xfs
2018 Jan 31
4
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
Nithya, I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is there any way we could possibly resolve it today? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:26 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov>, "gluster-users at
2018 Jan 31
0
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
On 31 January 2018 at 21:50, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > The values for shared-brick-count are still the same. I did not re-start > the volume after setting the cluster.min-free-inodes to 6%. Do I need to > restart it? > > > That is not necessary. Let me get back to you on this tomorrow. Regards, Nithya > Thanks, > > Eva (865) 574-6894
2018 Jan 31
0
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
Hi Freer, Our analysis is that this issue is caused by https://review.gluster.org/17618. Specifically, in 'gd_set_shared_brick_count()' from https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17618/9/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-utils.c . But even if we fix it today, I don't think we have a release planned immediately for shipping this. Are you planning to fix the code and re-compile? Regards,
2018 Jan 31
0
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
Hi Eva, I'm sorry but I need to get in touch with another developer to check about the changes here and he will be available only tomorrow. Is there someone else I could work with while you are away? Regards, Nithya On 31 January 2018 at 22:00, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is
2018 Jan 31
3
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
Amar, Thanks for your prompt reply. No, I do not plan to fix the code and re-compile. I was hoping it could be fixed with setting the shared-brick-count or some other option. Since this is a production system, we will wait until a fix is in a release. Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 12:15 PM To: Eva Freer
2018 Feb 01
0
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
Hi, I think we have a workaround for until we have a fix in the code. The following worked on my system. Copy the attached file to */usr/lib*/glusterfs/**3.12.4**/filter/*. (You might need to create the *filter* directory in this path.) Make sure the file has execute permissions. On my system: [root at rhgsserver1 fuse2]# cd /usr/lib/glusterfs/3.12.5/ [root at rhgsserver1 3.12.5]# l total 4.0K