search for: darkplaces

...; Just my two cents. From time to time I'm testing LLVM via > > compiling & running such big beasts as Qt and Mozilla. Also, > > at 2.0 time I tried to compile & test bunch of software from > > KDE and many others. > > I tried to compile the 3D game engine "darkplaces" with llvm-gcc > 4.2, but the produced binary didn't work. "Didn't work" means... what? Compilation failed? Program doesn't work? Either way: what mesages do you get? Are there any differences when compiling with the standard 4.2 gcc? (Some distributions install gcc...

> "Didn't work" means... what? Compilation failed? Program doesn't work? > Either way: what mesages do you get? The graphical screen was just blank. darkplaces emits some log messages as usual. But step by step... Used LLVM-GCC ------------- The used llvm-gcc, when run with "llmv-gcc --version" shows "llvm-gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5546) (LLVM build 47212)". So it has been a month ago when I did this test. I'm...

> Just my two cents. From time to time I'm testing LLVM via > compiling & running such big beasts as Qt and Mozilla. Also, > at 2.0 time I tried to compile & test bunch of software from > KDE and many others. I tried to compile the 3D game engine "darkplaces" with llvm-gcc 4.2, but the produced binary didn't work. However, I didn't find out how debug this further :-/ If you want, I can send the commands to get darkplaces, Nexuiz data files, patch to makefile & makefile.inc for llvm-gcc compilation.

Hello, Everyone > Tests that run a *lot* of complicated code would test the correctness of > the compiler. Think code written by crazy people that does crazy things; Just my two cents. From time to time I'm testing LLVM via compiling & running such big beasts as Qt and Mozilla. Also, at 2.0 time I tried to compile & test bunch of software from KDE and many others. They cannot