search for: dagger

Dear all, I would like to plot the dagger symbol in R (like LaTeX's \dagger). However, I was unable to do so. First, I thought maybe dagger actually exists just like the degree symbol: plot(0:1,0:1, type="n") text(x=0.5, y=0.5, labels=expression(degree)) plot(0:1,0:1, type="n") text(x=0.5, y=0.5, labels=expressio...

...ats based on LLVM [0][1][2][3][4] has proven LLVM's viability as a launchpad for stable platforms. However, issues with compilation time and compiler size have suggested that the translator must do too much, i.e. LLVM IR isn't a low-level enough virtual machine. So we introduce DAGIR ("dagger"), a new portable close to the metal format, designed to unlock the potential of any architecture for the digital world. DAGIR is a stable binary format derived from LLVM's SelectionDAG virtual machine, a proven platform for optimization and selection of machine architectures. Together wit...

...all > portion of x86 machine code decompiled to IR. That was several weeks > ago and it looks like the project has progressed quite a bit. > > Other projects: > https://github.com/libcpu/libcpu (tried this one a long time ago, also > couldn't get any decompilation) > http://dagger.repzret.org/ (they finally released some source! One of > the devs presented at a LLVM meeting) > > I am definitely interested in seeing a production-quality decompiler! > > Cheers, > Jevin Very cool, I just tested out dagger with a small x86_64 test and it worked! You can see my...

...2PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some >> supported target) to LLVM IR? If there isn't, does this seem like >> something that would be feasible? There's plenty of variations on the idea: Revgen/S2E, Fracture, Dagger (my own), libcpu, several closed-source ones used by pentest shops, some that use another representation before going to IR (say llvm-qemu), and probably others still I forgot about. Are you interested in a specific target / use case? > http://llvm.org/devmtg/2013-04/bougacha-slides.pdf >...

hi guys im trying to install vcrun2008 from wine tricks but it fails. even after a clean wine installation. I have tried installing vcrun2005 then 20008 and vise versa but still no success. Here the error code: Code: dagger at ubuntu:~$ sh winetricks vcrun2008drive_c already named harddiskvolume0 Executing wine /home/dagger/.winetrickscache/vcrun2008/vcredist_x86.exe fixme:clusapi:GetNodeClusterState ((null),0x32ec4c,0) stub! fixme:advapi:DecryptFileA "c:\\4784f177cf979230602a62e264204096\\" 00000000 fixme:h...

Hi - Not sure if anyone else saw this or cares about a decompiler (not personally tested) https://github.com/draperlaboratory/fracture I wonder if they have been in contact with anyone in the community in getting this upstreamed. Does it look interesting to anyone else? (thoughts/random comments/feedback)

In building R 2.6.2 from source for Mac OS X 2.5.1 (with i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1), 'make check' fails. The failure is in reg-plot.R, and occurs because Mac OS X's 'tr' command (invoked by Rdiff to strip carriage returns) regards the dagger sign in reg-plot.ps as an illegal byte sequence. I'm surprised that this doesn't seem to have been reported before, but it was already present at least in R 2.6.1 Incidentally, couldn't the handling of line endings now be left to svn:eol-style? Andrew Runnalls -- Dr Andrew Runnalls...

...ion should be strongly encouraged. I don’t know the current state of in-tree support. When Ahmed and I worked on the decompiler, we first targeted MC. Going to MI was more difficult and really wouldn’t have gotten us a lot of benefits. Instead, Ahmed pushed for directly decompiling to IR (look for dagger). I would actually be in favor for more infrastructure in MC for this kind of things. For instance, dealing with the code layout is not something MI is good at whereas MC is perfect. > > Ahmed? > >> Do you think the current design (modulo the changes suggested in the review) woul...

...ombet at apple.com <mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> When Ahmed and I worked on the decompiler, we first targeted MC. Going to MI was more difficult and really wouldn’t have gotten us a lot of benefits. Instead, Ahmed pushed for directly decompiling to IR (look for dagger). > > Thanks for the pointer Quentin. > >> I would actually be in favor for more infrastructure in MC for this kind of things. For instance, dealing with the code layout is not something MI is good at whereas MC is perfect. > > Most of LLVM’s target-specific information is i...

Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some supported target) to LLVM IR? If there isn't, does this seem like something that would be feasible? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150312/36eae2e4/attachment.html>

Is this a dagger which I see before me, The handle toward my hand? Come, let me clutch thee! I have thee not, and yet I see thee still. Art thou not, fatal vision, sensible To feeling as to sight? or art thou but A dagger of the mind, a false creation Proceeding from the heat-oppressed brain? I see thee yet, in for...

...>> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some > >> supported target) to LLVM IR? If there isn't, does this seem like > >> something that would be feasible? > > There's plenty of variations on the idea: Revgen/S2E, Fracture, Dagger > (my own), libcpu, several closed-source ones used by pentest shops, > some that use another representation before going to IR (say > llvm-qemu), and probably others still I forgot about. > > Are you interested in a specific target / use case? > > > I was t...

...5, 2018, at 3:38 PM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote: > > When Ahmed and I worked on the decompiler, we first targeted MC. Going to MI was more difficult and really wouldn’t have gotten us a lot of benefits. Instead, Ahmed pushed for directly decompiling to IR (look for dagger). Thanks for the pointer Quentin. > I would actually be in favor for more infrastructure in MC for this kind of things. For instance, dealing with the code layout is not something MI is good at whereas MC is perfect. Most of LLVM’s target-specific information is in TargetInstrInfo. TargetSche...

...01A SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK 0x83 0x0083 <control> 0x83 0x0192 LATIN SMALL LETTER F WITH HOOK 0x84 0x0084 <control> 0x84 0x201E DOUBLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK 0x85 0x0085 <control> 0x85 0x2026 HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS 0x86 0x0086 <control> 0x86 0x2020 DAGGER 0x87 0x0087 <control> 0x87 0x2021 DOUBLE DAGGER 0x88 0x0088 <control> 0x88 0x02C6 MODIFIER LETTER CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT= 0x89 0x0089 <control > 0x89 0x2030 PER MILLE SIGN 0x8A 0x008A <control> 0x8A 0x0160 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S WITH CARON= 0x8B 0x0...

...One way we could do that and that was discussed in the past would be to >> describe each instruction in terms of the generic mir operations. >> >> Ultimately we could get a lot of this semantic information automatically >> populated by TableGen using the ISel patterns, like dagger does >> (https://github.com/repzret/dagger). >>> Anyway, for the most part, I believe we could implement the >> “interpreter” for just a handful of instruction and get 90% of the >> information right. >> > > This seems interesting. We will need to investigate...

...apple.com <mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote: >>> >>> When Ahmed and I worked on the decompiler, we first targeted MC. Going to MI was more difficult and really wouldn’t have gotten us a lot of benefits. Instead, Ahmed pushed for directly decompiling to IR (look for dagger). >> >> Thanks for the pointer Quentin. >> >>> I would actually be in favor for more infrastructure in MC for this kind of things. For instance, dealing with the code layout is not something MI is good at whereas MC is perfect. >> >> Most of LLVM’s target-s...

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> wrote: > -llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu, that list isn't in use anymore. > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Kenneth Adam Miller via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I would like to restrain the compiler that I build on my local box from >

...hat we have for analyzing branches. One way we could do that and that was discussed in the past would be to describe each instruction in terms of the generic mir operations. Ultimately we could get a lot of this semantic information automatically populated by TableGen using the ISel patterns, like dagger does (https://github.com/repzret/dagger). Anyway, for the most part, I believe we could implement the “interpreter” for just a handful of instruction and get 90% of the information right. Cheers, -Quentin > On Feb 14, 2019, at 9:20 AM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > &...

Hi All, 2 of my summer interns (Aimee Dipietro and Greg Simpson) used their time over the summer to resurrect the LLVM C Backend: https://github.com/draperlaboratory/llvm-cbe Improvements include recovery of simple for/while loops (instead of goto), better variable naming, inline asm support, and making it work on a more recent version of llvm. I believe they used the repository here as a

...apons as well. At higher levels, there are more weapson with "natural" fire-damage - To'Loh Hammer, Clearing Bourgarde, etc. Paired with an appropriate weapon should be the corresponding mastery spell weapon skill. Eniripsas have damage bonuses with wands, no damage penalty/bonus with daggers, and damage penalties with all other weapons dofus (http://www.innicc.com) quote from dofus forum (http://www.7mmo.com) dofus kamas (http://www.dofuskamas.eu)