Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "dacapo".
Did you mean:
acaso
2011 May 13
2
[LLVMdev] [VMKit] 2.9 or ToT? Java version/features?
...actice?
--What features of Java does VMKit support? Is there a corresponding
java 'version' (1.4, 1.6, etc) that VMKit supports? (Is this
documented somewhere? I was unable to find it)
And since I'm feeling lucky: What's the status of VMKit? Is it still
able to run tomcat, and the dacapo benchmarks (on x86 anyway)?
Thanks for your time,
~Will
2011 May 13
0
[LLVMdev] [VMKit] 2.9 or ToT? Java version/features?
...unimplemented feature of 1.6). But vmkit does
not to have to be tight to a base library implementation. An interesting
project to work on would be to support the OpenJDK library.
>
> And since I'm feeling lucky: What's the status of VMKit? Is it still
> able to run tomcat, and the dacapo benchmarks (on x86 anyway)?
>
>
Yes, it works well on a x86 machine (x64 is not supported by the GC). And it
is able to run tomcat and some of the dacapo benchmarks. There are some
applications and dacapo benchmarks that don't work because of GNU Classpath
being incomplete. Another reason...
2011 Aug 15
1
[LLVMdev] [VMKit] 2.9 or ToT? Java version/features?
...ould semi-mentor on if I were to undertake
it? :).
Not sure if we'll go in this direction, but if we are to continue to
use VMKit I think we'll have to do so.
>>
>> And since I'm feeling lucky: What's the status of VMKit? Is it still
>> able to run tomcat, and the dacapo benchmarks (on x86 anyway)?
>>
>
> Yes, it works well on a x86 machine (x64 is not supported by the GC). And it
> is able to run tomcat and some of the dacapo benchmarks. There are some
> applications and dacapo benchmarks that don't work because of GNU Classpath
> being in...