Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "da93e2ee".
2015 Jan 20
2
Problem with Cisco Phones
...nference mixing, which I guess it would do in CallManager?
<--- SIP read from TCP:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:50604 --->
REFER sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:50604;branch=z9hG4bK48c7492c
From: "4005" <sip:4005 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>;tag=203a07fceb4b00eff1377deb-da93e2ee
To: <sip:4004 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>
Call-ID: OutOfDialog--001e-67a906f5-5333c2b8 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Max-Forwards: 70
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:10:19 GMT
CSeq: 101 REFER
User-Agent: Cisco-CP7945G/9.4.2
Contact: <sip:4005 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:50604;transport=tcp>
Referred-By: "4005"...
2015 Jan 20
0
Problem with Cisco Phones
...it would do in CallManager?
>
> <--- SIP read from TCP:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:50604 --->
> REFER sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/TCP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:50604;branch=z9hG4bK48c7492c
> From: "4005" <sip:4005 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> >;tag=203a07fceb4b00eff1377deb-da93e2ee
> To: <sip:4004 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>
> Call-ID: OutOfDialog--001e-67a906f5-5333c2b8 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> Max-Forwards: 70
> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:10:19 GMT
> CSeq: 101 REFER
> User-Agent: Cisco-CP7945G/9.4.2
> Contact: <sip:4005 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:50604;transport=tc...
2015 Jan 20
2
Problem with Cisco Phones
We were using G722 - I thought similarly and tried a call with alaw. Same problem occurred, any other ideas?
> I'm willing to bet you are forcing the use of G729. 7940 and 7960 phones can
> only do a single G729 channel, and if you require G729 for the second leg of a
> conference, it will fail.
This message may be private and confidential. If you have received this message in