search for: d_printf

...b_tdb.c invalidates + the iterator in tdb_update_sam (called by pdb_update_sam_account). The result is + an iterator error in the next pdb_getsampwent of the loop. MUST BE CORRECTED*/ + d_printf("Successully updated primary group SID for user %s\n", usrname); + } + else { + d_printf("Could not update primary group SID for user %s\n", usrname); +...

...dest_ip; /* have to open a new connection */ - if (!(c=cli_initialise(NULL)) || (cli_set_port(c, port) != port) || + + if (!(c=cli_initialise(NULL)) || !(c->timeout = connect_timeout) || + (cli_set_port(c, port) != port) || !cli_connect(c, server_n, &ip)) { d_printf("Connection to %s failed\n", server_n); return NULL; @@ -2650,22 +2654,33 @@ if (!cli) return 1; + if (*cli->server_domain) { + printf("Domain=[%s] OS=[%s] Server=[%s]\n", + cli->server_domain,cli->server_os,cli->server_type)...

...you are asking here. ---------------------> As you have stated correctly the client and server logs are not consolidated. However, what I want to know is where do the DEBUG statements in the client code (for example client/client.c/do_this_one() line no. 309) get printed? Also, where are the d_printf() statements printed? ---------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partner online Go to: http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-matrimony

Hi. Does anyone know of a good imap stress testing tool? And one which supports SEARCH commands? I have to compare Courier and Dovecot. I already did some tests using a modified postal/rabid package. I would be thankfully for any hints. Best regards. Erny Yaco Sistemas Spain

Gerry, all: HELP! On mandriva, I compiled samba from source and got it running, but I cannot connect from windows. (see my post from earlier "[Samba] Compiling and Configuring Samba for Mandrival") I think this relates to the group/SID changes discussed in the release notes. However, I'm not smart enough to figure it out. The tarball compiled and installed fine. It

...mVersion values */ + + status = net_set_machine_opsystem( ctx, ads ); + if ( !ADS_ERR_OK(status) ) { + d_fprintf(stderr,"Cannot set operatingSystem or operatingSystemVersion\n"); + d_fprintf(stderr,"values, but you cat set it manually\n"); + } + d_printf("Joined '%s' to realm '%s'\n", global_myname(), ads->config.realm); SAFE_FREE(machine_account); --- net_ads.c ends here --- -- With Best Regards. Rashid N. Achilov (RNA1-RIPE), Web: http://www.askd.ru/~shelton OOO "ACK" telecommunications adminis...

Dear Samba users, I am trying to update our local samba packages to 3.0.28. They are built against heimdal-1.0.1 and openldap-2.3.38. The Redhat Enterprise Linux 3 and 4 packages are working fine so far in my limited testing. The problem with heimdal and "net ads join..." has been fixed on all 3 platforms. On the Solaris 8 server, the "net ads join..." works correctly and the

> I've now managed to replicate the error on my test setup. I added a > third host and all hell broke loose - no locking at all when opening > Excel files apart from same-host. It seemed fine with two. > > I then downgraded to 4.4.5 and the problem persisted. So it cannot be > a regression from that patch. > > Regards, > > Alex > Here you go: Locked files:

...um, NULL); > if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { > status = cli_ntcreate(targetcli, targetname, 0, > FILE_READ_DATA, 0, > - FILE_SHARE_READ|FILE_SHARE_WRITE, FILE_OPEN, > + 0, FILE_OPEN, > 0x0, 0x0, &fnum, NULL); > if (NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { > d_printf("open file %s: for read/write fnum %d\n", targetname, fnum); > -- 2.7.4 -- This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential information. Unless you are that person, you may not disclose its contents or use it in any way and are requested to delete the mess...

Has anyone tried building Samba 4.0 on AIX with XLC? I'm moving right along, but tripping up on some bugs in source3/utils/net_rpc.c, source3/utils/net_rpc_printer.c, and source3/utils/net_cache.c where there is an invalid use of the ":" operator. According to some other posts on the PostgreSQL forum, this shouldn't compile anywhere, even though GCC apparently allows it??

First thing - I'd like to say a big "THANK YOU" to the developers. I just upgraded to samba-3.0.23 and I've noticed an alarming issue with respect to my configuration. I've been using the built-in keytab management and it looks like the updated code no longer creates the userPrincipal in Active Directory. Whether this is an issue for others or not, it would be nice to have