Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "d_has_iterator_debug".
2008 Nov 26
1
[LLVMdev] Removal of Visual Studio project files.
Nice, very well done on the CMake build. This command worked perfectly:
cmake -G "Visual Studio 8 2005"
-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-D_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_DEPRECATE
-D_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE -D_SECURE_SCL=0 -D_SCL_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE
-D_HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING=0" ..\trunk > ..\build_log.txt
And for the actual build, went very well. The INSTALL was much
project was better then I was expecting (although did not install to a
place I wanted it to, I guess that can be changed with another option
passed to the above command-line call). No errors...
2010 Mar 06
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH]: MSVC build enhancements
...can leads to great performance
>> improvement in STL heavy code (up to x10 and more on particular code)).
>
> I use this for every bit of my code:
> /D_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_DEPRECATE /D_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE
> /D_CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS /D_SECURE_SCL=0 /D_SCL_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE
> /D_HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING=0
>
> In one particular class in one of my libraries, the speed difference
> is the difference of it running in about 10ms, compared to it running
> in about 12 minutes, and yes that is accurate. That is a lot greater
> then just "10x". Whoever was the retard at MS th...
2010 Mar 06
4
[LLVMdev] [PATCH]: MSVC build enhancements
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Cédric Venet <cedric.venet at laposte.net> wrote:
> Le 06/03/2010 11:43, José Fonseca a écrit :
>>
>> Attached are two patches with MSVC build enchancements.
>>
>> They are quite trivial, but were necessary to correctly link LLVM
>> libraries with Mesa3D on Windows.
>>
>> Jose
>>
>
> Are you volontary
2010 Mar 06
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH]: MSVC build enhancements
...t;>>>>> code)).
>>>>>
>>>>> I use this for every bit of my code:
>>>>> /D_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_DEPRECATE /D_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE
>>>>> /D_CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS /D_SECURE_SCL=0 /D_SCL_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE
>>>>> /D_HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING=0
>>>>>
>>>>> In one particular class in one of my libraries, the speed difference
>>>>> is the difference of it running in about 10ms, compared to it running
>>>>> in about 12 minutes, and yes that is accurate. That is a lot greater...
2008 Nov 25
0
[LLVMdev] Removal of Visual Studio project files.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote:
> /* snip */
Thanks so much for that information. :)
For note, this is my usual line I add to the end of my preprocessor
definitions in *every* single project I ever open now (thanks to some
very bad memories associated with not having them).
2008 Nov 25
2
[LLVMdev] Removal of Visual Studio project files.
"Cory Nelson" <phrosty at gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote:
>> OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> writes:
>>> As long as instructions are supplied on how to pass in user defined
>>> macros to the build system. I have to turn off a lot of the extra
>>> safety crap that