search for: d_has_iterator_debug

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "d_has_iterator_debug".

2008 Nov 26
1
[LLVMdev] Removal of Visual Studio project files.
Nice, very well done on the CMake build. This command worked perfectly: cmake -G "Visual Studio 8 2005" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-D_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_DEPRECATE -D_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE -D_SECURE_SCL=0 -D_SCL_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE -D_HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING=0" ..\trunk > ..\build_log.txt And for the actual build, went very well. The INSTALL was much project was better then I was expecting (although did not install to a place I wanted it to, I guess that can be changed with another option passed to the above command-line call). No errors...
2010 Mar 06
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH]: MSVC build enhancements
...can leads to great performance >> improvement in STL heavy code (up to x10 and more on particular code)). > > I use this for every bit of my code: >  /D_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_DEPRECATE /D_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE > /D_CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS /D_SECURE_SCL=0 /D_SCL_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE > /D_HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING=0 > > In one particular class in one of my libraries, the speed difference > is the difference of it running in about 10ms, compared to it running > in about 12 minutes, and yes that is accurate.  That is a lot greater > then just "10x".  Whoever was the retard at MS th...
2010 Mar 06
4
[LLVMdev] [PATCH]: MSVC build enhancements
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Cédric Venet <cedric.venet at laposte.net> wrote: > Le 06/03/2010 11:43, José Fonseca a écrit : >> >> Attached are two patches with MSVC build enchancements. >> >> They are quite trivial, but were necessary to correctly link LLVM >> libraries with Mesa3D on Windows. >> >> Jose >> > > Are you volontary
2010 Mar 06
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH]: MSVC build enhancements
...t;>>>>> code)). >>>>> >>>>> I use this for every bit of my code: >>>>>   /D_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_DEPRECATE /D_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE >>>>> /D_CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS /D_SECURE_SCL=0 /D_SCL_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE >>>>> /D_HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING=0 >>>>> >>>>> In one particular class in one of my libraries, the speed difference >>>>> is the difference of it running in about 10ms, compared to it running >>>>> in about 12 minutes, and yes that is accurate.  That is a lot greater...
2008 Nov 25
0
[LLVMdev] Removal of Visual Studio project files.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > /* snip */ Thanks so much for that information. :) For note, this is my usual line I add to the end of my preprocessor definitions in *every* single project I ever open now (thanks to some very bad memories associated with not having them).
2008 Nov 25
2
[LLVMdev] Removal of Visual Studio project files.
"Cory Nelson" <phrosty at gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: >> OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> writes: >>> As long as instructions are supplied on how to pass in user defined >>> macros to the build system. I have to turn off a lot of the extra >>> safety crap that