Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "d_glibcxx_concept_checks".
2008 Oct 15
1
[LLVMdev] MINGW Compiler error.
LLVM is not currently concept-check clean. Your MinGW is apparently
configured with --enable-concept-checks, or something in your
toolchain is causing -D_GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS to be added to the
build, and LLVM currently cannot be built this way.
The errors you've posted so far are just the beginning; there
are many more errors after them. Some widely-used idioms within
LLVM violate standard concept requirements; fixing these will
require some broad changes.
Dan
O...
2008 Oct 14
0
[LLVMdev] MINGW Compiler error.
Resend
On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:40 AM, Mark Kromis wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have a compiler error that I have not been able to get through. I
> usually depend upon pre-built binaries but there was none available
> for the pre-release. I also try scanning the web site and mail list
> but was unable to find an answer. I was getting this or similar
> error with 2.3. I am
2008 Oct 14
3
[LLVMdev] MINGW Compiler error.
Greetings,
I have a compiler error that I have not been able to get through. I
usually depend upon pre-built binaries but there was none available
for the pre-release. I also try scanning the web site and mail list
but was unable to find an answer. I was getting this or similar error
with 2.3. I am just trying to build with the core library. I tried
this in a xp and vista VM with the
2019 Sep 03
2
SourceMgr vs EXPENSIVE_CHECKS
...Thanks,
Jay.
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 20:00, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Looks to me like a bug in GCC's constexpr+_GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS support. Small test case:
>
> $ g++-8 test.cpp -std=c++2a -fsyntax-only
> $ g++-8 test.cpp -std=c++2a -fsyntax-only -D_GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/8/algorithm:62,
> from test.cpp:1:
> test.cpp:3:27: in ‘constexpr’ expansion of ‘std::min<int>(std::initializer_list<int>{((const int*)(& ._61)), 6})’
> /usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_algo.h:3451:31: error: ‘conste...
2019 Oct 02
2
SourceMgr vs EXPENSIVE_CHECKS
...vid Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Looks to me like a bug in GCC's constexpr+_GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS support. Small test case:
>> >
>> > $ g++-8 test.cpp -std=c++2a -fsyntax-only
>> > $ g++-8 test.cpp -std=c++2a -fsyntax-only -D_GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS
>> > In file included from /usr/include/c++/8/algorithm:62,
>> > from test.cpp:1:
>> > test.cpp:3:27: in ‘constexpr’ expansion of ‘std::min<int>(std::initializer_list<int>{((const int*)(& ._61)), 6})’
>> > /usr/include/c++/8/bit...
2019 Sep 03
2
SourceMgr vs EXPENSIVE_CHECKS
Hi,
I'm trying to build llvm (git monorepo) on Ubuntu 18.04 with
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS enabled and running into various errors compiling
SourceMgr.cpp, depending on which host compiler I use.
For example with GCC:
$ CC=gcc-8 CXX=g++-8 cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
-DLLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS=ON ~/git/llvm-project/llvm/ && ninja
...
[89/2690] Building CXX object