search for: d_glibcxx_concept_checks

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "d_glibcxx_concept_checks".

2008 Oct 15
1
[LLVMdev] MINGW Compiler error.
LLVM is not currently concept-check clean. Your MinGW is apparently configured with --enable-concept-checks, or something in your toolchain is causing -D_GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS to be added to the build, and LLVM currently cannot be built this way. The errors you've posted so far are just the beginning; there are many more errors after them. Some widely-used idioms within LLVM violate standard concept requirements; fixing these will require some broad changes. Dan O...
2008 Oct 14
0
[LLVMdev] MINGW Compiler error.
Resend On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:40 AM, Mark Kromis wrote: > Greetings, > > I have a compiler error that I have not been able to get through. I > usually depend upon pre-built binaries but there was none available > for the pre-release. I also try scanning the web site and mail list > but was unable to find an answer. I was getting this or similar > error with 2.3. I am
2008 Oct 14
3
[LLVMdev] MINGW Compiler error.
Greetings, I have a compiler error that I have not been able to get through. I usually depend upon pre-built binaries but there was none available for the pre-release. I also try scanning the web site and mail list but was unable to find an answer. I was getting this or similar error with 2.3. I am just trying to build with the core library. I tried this in a xp and vista VM with the
2019 Sep 03
2
SourceMgr vs EXPENSIVE_CHECKS
...Thanks, Jay. On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 20:00, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > Looks to me like a bug in GCC's constexpr+_GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS support. Small test case: > > $ g++-8 test.cpp -std=c++2a -fsyntax-only > $ g++-8 test.cpp -std=c++2a -fsyntax-only -D_GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS > In file included from /usr/include/c++/8/algorithm:62, > from test.cpp:1: > test.cpp:3:27: in ‘constexpr’ expansion of ‘std::min<int>(std::initializer_list<int>{((const int*)(& ._61)), 6})’ > /usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_algo.h:3451:31: error: ‘conste...
2019 Oct 02
2
SourceMgr vs EXPENSIVE_CHECKS
...vid Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Looks to me like a bug in GCC's constexpr+_GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS support. Small test case: >> > >> > $ g++-8 test.cpp -std=c++2a -fsyntax-only >> > $ g++-8 test.cpp -std=c++2a -fsyntax-only -D_GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS >> > In file included from /usr/include/c++/8/algorithm:62, >> > from test.cpp:1: >> > test.cpp:3:27: in ‘constexpr’ expansion of ‘std::min<int>(std::initializer_list<int>{((const int*)(& ._61)), 6})’ >> > /usr/include/c++/8/bit...
2019 Sep 03
2
SourceMgr vs EXPENSIVE_CHECKS
Hi, I'm trying to build llvm (git monorepo) on Ubuntu 18.04 with EXPENSIVE_CHECKS enabled and running into various errors compiling SourceMgr.cpp, depending on which host compiler I use. For example with GCC: $ CC=gcc-8 CXX=g++-8 cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DLLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS=ON ~/git/llvm-project/llvm/ && ninja ... [89/2690] Building CXX object