Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d9dff7e0".
Did you mean:
d9bff720
2013 Nov 07
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...ll is less expensive (IMO) than doing one-off updates from
release X to release X+N. And it still dwarfs the cost of using a
reasonably modern toolchain.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131107/d9dff7e0/attachment.html>
2013 Nov 07
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> writes:
> In a nutshell, if we want the toolchain to evolve with time, we'll
> need to have API changes, and we'll need to update surrounding
> software to cope with that. The only difference is if we want to be
> doing this as our day-to-day job, or twice a year (or even less than
> that if you stay on a release for a while