Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "d9858".
Did you mean:
9858
2015 May 20
3
[LLVMdev] Empty emails from phabricator
...il.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] builtins: Add __probestack support functions for x86
> To: john.mailinglists at gmail.com
> Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu, howard.hinnant at gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:13:07 +0000 (5 hours, 39 minutes, 29 seconds ago)
> Reply-To: reviews+D9858+public+2b5918b1dd4651e5 at reviews.llvm.org
>
> REPOSITORY
> rL LLVM
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D9858
>
> EMAIL PREFERENCES
> http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-com...
2015 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] Adding a stack probe function attribute
...erly eager to merge my patches,
let's see if we can't figure things out here.
I noticed a string function attribute appeared in LangRef.rst, would
that be the correct place to document this?
For reference:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9653
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9654
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9858
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:34 PM, John Kåre Alsaker
<john.mailinglists at gmail.com> wrote:
> I updated http://reviews.llvm.org/D4717 and also wrote an __probestack
> implementation:
> https://github.com/Zoxc/compiler-rt/compare/llvm-mirror:master...stprobe
>
> Which instruction...
2015 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] Empty emails from phabricator
...TCH] builtins: Add __probestack support functions for x86
>>> To: john.mailinglists at gmail.com
>>> Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu, howard.hinnant at gmail.com
>>> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:13:07 +0000 (5 hours, 39 minutes, 29 seconds ago)
>>> Reply-To: reviews+D9858+public+2b5918b1dd4651e5 at reviews.llvm.org
>>>
>>> REPOSITORY
>>> rL LLVM
>>>
>>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D9858
>>>
>>> EMAIL PREFERENCES
>>> http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
>>>
>>&g...
2015 Jul 27
3
[LLVMdev] Adding a stack probe function attribute
...9;s see if we can't figure things out here.
>
> I noticed a string function attribute appeared in LangRef.rst, would
> that be the correct place to document this?
>
> For reference:
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D9653
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D9654
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D9858
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:34 PM, John Kåre Alsaker
> <john.mailinglists at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I updated http://reviews.llvm.org/D4717 and also wrote an __probestack
> > implementation:
> > https://github.com/Zoxc/compiler-rt/compare/llvm-mirror:master...stprob...
2014 Aug 06
2
[LLVMdev] Adding a stack probe function attribute
I updated http://reviews.llvm.org/D4717 and also wrote an __probestack
implementation:
https://github.com/Zoxc/compiler-rt/compare/llvm-mirror:master...stprobe
Which instruction would be the preferable one to probe with? I used OR
since that's what GCC/libgcc does, but I don't see why that would be better
than a write.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at
2015 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] Adding a stack probe function attribute
...hings out here.
>>
>> I noticed a string function attribute appeared in LangRef.rst, would
>> that be the correct place to document this?
>>
>> For reference:
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D9653
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D9654
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D9858
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:34 PM, John Kåre Alsaker
>> <john.mailinglists at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I updated http://reviews.llvm.org/D4717 and also wrote an __probestack
>> > implementation:
>> > https://github.com/Zoxc/compiler-rt/compare/llv...