search for: d97e5276

Hello David, > I'm seeing a case where ARM Load/Store optimizer is breaking code. I have > not had any luck trying to come up with a minimal example; it is breaking in > our stage 2 LLVM build. Still, *any* testcase is better than no testcase :) -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

...no testcase :) > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov > Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120206/d97e5276/attachment.html>

Evan & llvmdev, I'm seeing a case where ARM Load/Store optimizer is breaking code. I have not had any luck trying to come up with a minimal example; it is breaking in our stage 2 LLVM build. But here's what I'm seeing in the debug output: # Before ARMLoadStoreOptimizer: BB#21: derived from LLVM BB %cond.end Live Ins: %LR %R0 %R1 %R7 %R10 %R11 Predecessors according to