Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "d9634".
Did you mean:
d934
2015 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] Semantics of an Inbounds GetElementPtr
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Nicholas White <n.j.white at gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's not quite the same testcase.
> Yes - it's an extension of the first test case that I'd expect to be
> optimised out in the same way as my earlier example (i.e., store a
> value, read it back and branch on it). If you miss out the
> "check.first.array.element" block