search for: d89240

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "d89240".

Did you mean: d29240
2020 Nov 10
1
RFC: Combining Annotation Metadata and Remarks
...ncrete use cases that need more specialized rules. What do you think? > > I'm all for it. Also, the things I mention here don't need to be part of the first patch (set), just something to keep in mind. Sounds good. For now, I split up the original WIP patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/D89240 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89240>) into two separate ones: 1. Add !annotation metadata and AnnotationRemarks generation https://reviews.llvm.org/D91188 2. __attribute__((annotate(“”) to !annotate metadata conversion https://reviews.llvm.org/D91195 Cheers, Florian -------------- next part -...
2020 Nov 09
2
RFC: Combining Annotation Metadata and Remarks
> On Nov 6, 2020, at 17:32, Johannes Doerfert <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote: > > Cool! I really like the idea. I left a comment about metadata preservation below. > Once this is available we will certainly employ it to understand OpenMP programs better. That sounds like a great use case! Having multiple different uses cases during the bring-up would be very helpful to
2020 Nov 04
2
RFC: Combining Annotation Metadata and Remarks
...ould also be helpful. While I intend to work on some parts directly to start with, I hope this pitch also sparks more interest and others will be interested in collaborating as well. I also put up an initial patch adding the infrastructure outlined in the first two points: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89240 The proposal also ties together and is enabled by some of the excellent work around the remark infrastructure recently, such as Francis’ work on emitting remarks as part of the binary or Jessica’s work on a remarks-based code-size diffing tool (https://reviews.llvm.org/D63306) Cheers, Florian
2020 Nov 06
0
RFC: Combining Annotation Metadata and Remarks
...be helpful. > > While I intend to work on some parts directly to start with, I hope this pitch also sparks more interest and others will be interested in collaborating as well. I also put up an initial patch adding the infrastructure outlined in the first two points: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89240 > > The proposal also ties together and is enabled by some of the excellent work around the remark infrastructure recently, such as Francis’ work on emitting remarks as part of the binary or Jessica’s work on a remarks-based code-size diffing tool (https://reviews.llvm.org/D63306) > > &...