search for: d87149

...y are UB if they loop infinitely and otherwise > finite and therefore a no-op. So we can either delete them, by assuming > they are finite, or, if we know they are not, actually eliminate > anything that is known to transfer execution to the loop [0]. > > [0] https://reviews.llvm.org/D87149 > > ~ Johannes > > > -Hal >

This bot was failing from http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/29505 until it went green on http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/29534 Anyone happen to know why? I can't quite figure it out from the commits - would be good to know if it's a buildbot issue or a genuine LLVM problem that was in the LLVM code and fixed by one of those

On 9/5/20 12:40 AM, Atmn Patel wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 1:07 AM Johannes Doerfert > <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 9/4/20 7:39 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote: >> > >> > On 9/4/20 6:31 PM, Atmn Patel via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> We’ve prepared a new function attribute

...e > >> finite and therefore a no-op. So we can either delete them, by assuming > >> they are finite, or, if we know they are not, actually eliminate > >> anything that is known to transfer execution to the loop [0]. > >> > >> [0] https://reviews.llvm.org/D87149 > >> > >> ~ Johannes > >> > >> > -Hal > >> > -- > Hal Finkel > Lead, Compiler Technology and Programming Languages > Leadership Computing Facility > Argonne National Laboratory >