Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "d87103".
2020 Sep 03
3
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
Should be fixed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D87103
Shall we consider deprecating(emitting a warning)/removing %T from
lit? lldb, lld/COFF and clang-tools-extra are the three major users of
%T. There are a few other %T in other places but there are not too
many. We will also investigate whether other projects using lit are
using %T.
On Thu, Sep 3,...
2020 Sep 03
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
...But will depend a bit on what the uses of %T look like, maybe there are
> some good uses of it that we haven't thought of until we see them.
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:33 PM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote:
>
>> Should be fixed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D87103
>>
>> Shall we consider deprecating(emitting a warning)/removing %T from
>> lit? lldb, lld/COFF and clang-tools-extra are the three major users of
>> %T. There are a few other %T in other places but there are not too
>> many. We will also investigate whether other proj...
2020 Sep 03
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
...ill depend a bit on what the uses of %T look like, maybe there are
> some good uses of it that we haven't thought of until we see them.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:33 PM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote:
>
> Should be fixed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D87103
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/reviews.llvm.org/D87103__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!pMM0AcKS3gRL1wx2OJk-DMZG6KNuO3f602ILYnDX01_Q_Se_K_tNOHEg9mXzlKTnBw$>
>
> Shall we consider deprecating(emitting a warning)/removing %T from
> lit? lldb, lld/COFF and clang-tools-extra are the three...
2020 Sep 04
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
...ill depend a bit on what the uses of %T look like, maybe there are
> some good uses of it that we haven't thought of until we see them.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:33 PM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote:
>
> Should be fixed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D87103
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/reviews.llvm.org/D87103__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!pMM0AcKS3gRL1wx2OJk-DMZG6KNuO3f602ILYnDX01_Q_Se_K_tNOHEg9mXzlKTnBw$>
>
> Shall we consider deprecating(emitting a warning)/removing %T from
> lit? lldb, lld/COFF and clang-tools-extra are the three...
2020 Sep 03
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
This is likely due to a race condition (%T is a shared parent
directory). I'll put up a patch to fix it.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:00 AM David Blaikie via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Is the machine running any jobs in parallel? Would it be worth trying running lit in the loop, rather than the script? (perhaps lit's doing something interesting) or maybe the