search for: d87011

...CU that are DWARF32/64. This is supported by DWARF format. With this mix it is possible that even with DWARF64 enabled one can still encounter relocation overflows errors in LLD if DWARF32 sections happen to be processed towards the end. One proposal that was discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D87011, is to modify LLD linker to arrange debug_info sections so that DWARF32 comes first, and DWARF64 after them. This way as long as DWARF32 sections don't themselves go over 4gigs, the final binary can contain debug information that exceeds 4gig. Which I think will be the common case. An alternat...

...F32/64. This is supported by DWARF format. With this mix it is possible that even with DWARF64 enabled one can still encounter relocation overflows errors in LLD if DWARF32 sections happen to be processed towards the end. >> >> One proposal that was discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D87011, is to modify LLD linker to arrange debug_info sections so that DWARF32 comes first, and DWARF64 after them. This way as long as DWARF32 sections don't themselves go over 4gigs, the final binary can contain debug information that exceeds 4gig. Which I think will be the common case. >> &gt...

...This is supported > by DWARF format. With this mix it is possible that even with DWARF64 > enabled one can still encounter relocation overflows errors in LLD if > DWARF32 sections happen to be processed towards the end. > > One proposal that was discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D87011, is to > modify LLD linker to arrange debug_info sections so that DWARF32 comes > first, and DWARF64 after them. This way as long as DWARF32 sections don't > themselves go over 4gigs, the final binary can contain debug information > that exceeds 4gig. Which I think will be the commo...

...orted by DWARF format. With this mix it is possible that even with > DWARF64 enabled one can still encounter relocation overflows errors in LLD > if DWARF32 sections happen to be processed towards the end. > >> > >> One proposal that was discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D87011, is > to modify LLD linker to arrange debug_info sections so that DWARF32 comes > first, and DWARF64 after them. This way as long as DWARF32 sections don't > themselves go over 4gigs, the final binary can contain debug information > that exceeds 4gig. Which I think will be the commo...

...possible that even with >> DWARF64 enabled one can still encounter relocation overflows errors in LLD >> if DWARF32 sections happen to be processed towards the end. >> >> >> >> >> >> One proposal that was discussed in >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D87011 >> RvKRSx!pnSYzjQly_yuEU-ng7OYd8nr3h3tSYOjeCwnH7cr3hA73rA8aVlNzOfQPo9Ue7WdoQ$ >> , is to modify LLD linker to arrange debug_info sections so that DWARF32 >> comes first, and DWARF64 after them. This way as long as DWARF32 sections >> don't themselves go over 4gigs, the f...

...pported by DWARF format. With this mix it is possible that even with DWARF64 enabled one can still encounter relocation overflows errors in LLD if DWARF32 sections happen to be processed towards the end. >> >> >> >> One proposal that was discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D87011, is to modify LLD linker to arrange debug_info sections so that DWARF32 comes first, and DWARF64 after them. This way as long as DWARF32 sections don't themselves go over 4gigs, the final binary can contain debug information that exceeds 4gig. Which I think will be the common case. >> &gt...

...> DWARF64 enabled one can still encounter relocation overflows errors in LLD >> if DWARF32 sections happen to be processed towards the end. >> >> >> >> >> >> One proposal that was discussed in >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://reviews.llvm.org/D87011__;!!JmoZiZGBv3 >> RvKRSx!pnSYzjQly_yuEU-ng7OYd8nr3h3tSYOjeCwnH7cr3hA73rA8aVlNzOfQPo9Ue7WdoQ$ >> , is to modify LLD linker to arrange debug_info sections so that DWARF32 >> comes first, and DWARF64 after them. This way as long as DWARF32 sections >> don't themselves go ov...