search for: d86a2d94

...ut not native object files!) Reid. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040803/d86a2d94/attachment.sig>

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Vikram Adve wrote: > First, I think the name should convey the purpose of the tool -- > otherwise, it just creates a confusing acronym (and goodness knows we > have enough names already, even though most of them are clear). Yes, I totally agree. > Unfortunately this leads me to vote against llvmcs -- it's vague and > (worse) a misnomer. A

I have been at Microsoft the last couple of days and so couldn't join the discussion earlier. Here's my view of the name issue, and (the reason this is long), a little about how I think we want users to view this tool: First, I think the name should convey the purpose of the tool -- otherwise, it just creates a confusing acronym (and goodness knows we have enough names already, even