search for: d86855

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d86855".

Did you mean: d26855
2020 Aug 30
3
Proposal to remove MMX support.
...existing SSE/SSE2 compiler builtins, on both x86-32 and x86-64, and then *delete the MMX implementation of these intrinsics*. We would thus stop supporting the use of these intrinsics, without SSE2 also enabled. I've created a preliminary patch for these header changes, https://reviews.llvm.org/D86855. Sometime later, we should then remove the MMX intrinsics in LLVM IR. (Only the intrinsics -- the machine-instruction and register definitions for MMX should be kept indefinitely for use by assembly code.) That raises the question of bitcode compat. Maybe we do something to prevent new use of the...
2020 Aug 31
2
Proposal to remove MMX support.
...mpiler builtins, on > both x86-32 and x86-64, and then *delete the MMX implementation of these > intrinsics*. We would thus stop supporting the use of these intrinsics, > without SSE2 also enabled. I've created a preliminary patch for these > header changes, https://reviews.llvm.org/D86855. > > > > Sometime later, we should then remove the MMX intrinsics in LLVM IR. (Only > the intrinsics -- the machine-instruction and register definitions for MMX > should be kept indefinitely for use by assembly code.) That raises the > question of bitcode compat. Maybe we do so...