Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "d8599".
Did you mean:
18599
2015 Apr 15
2
[LLVMdev] About the "debugger target"
While I've already posted reviews for the initial patches for this (see
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8506 and http://reviews.llvm.org/D8599), the
grapevine suggests I should post a lengthier description of my intent
for the "debugger target." The idea was prompted by a suggestion from
Eric Christopher, and I'm running with it.
Various bits of the DWARF we produce are conditional on the target
platform, or on command-lin...
2015 May 08
3
[LLVMdev] [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What does "debugger tuning" mean?
...e IsDarwin field from the class.)
Add feature flags for the various other things mentioned on the thread (linkage names, figuring out what to do with DW_AT_APPLE_* attributes, etc) with appropriate defaulting.
Oh yeah, the Clang command-line option, which has its own review (http://reviews.llvm.org/D8599) but needs a whole 'nother round of discussion and bikeshedding that didn't seem relevant to the LLVM part. I haven't been pinging it because we needed to get the LLVM part sorted first.
Eventually there would be Clang things probably that want to be tuning-influenced, e.g. the inherit...
2015 May 06
2
[LLVMdev] [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What does "debugger tuning" mean?
I don’t think there was a driver patch so far, was there?
-- adrian
> On May 6, 2015, at 1:19 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Does the patch do all of this?
>
> -eric
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:18 PM Robinson, Paul <Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com <mailto:Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com>> wrote:
> I just skimmed
2015 May 08
3
[LLVMdev] [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What does "debugger tuning" mean?
...arwin field from the class.) Add feature flags for the various other things mentioned on the thread (linkage names, figuring out what to do with DW_AT_APPLE_* attributes, etc) with appropriate defaulting.
> Oh yeah, the Clang command-line option, which has its own review (http://reviews.llvm.org/D8599) but needs a whole 'nother round of discussion and bikeshedding that didn't seem relevant to the LLVM part. I haven't been pinging it because we needed to get the LLVM part sorted first.
> Eventually there would be Clang things probably that want to be tuning-influenced, e.g. the in...